employee
graduate student
Achieving the sustainable development goals laid down in the national projects of the Russian Federation requires the formation of new strategic guidelines for companies. They can be most succinctly represented by the concept of ESG factors (environmental, social, managerial), which in turn are closely related to the concept of sustainable and responsible investment, which directly addresses financial issues in the light of global risks of climate degradation, ecology, and corporate governance. Revealing the essence, role and place of strategic management based on ESG factors, the authors justify the necessity and possibility of shifting the emphasis of the financial investment market towards responsible investment. The article discusses its main elements, the theory of the relationship of ESG factors with the financial performance of firms, driving the interests of investors, and provides approaches to investment that contribute to sustainable development in various ways.
sustainable development, ESG-factors, ESG-risks, responsible investment, strategy
1. Bykova O.N., Repnikova V.M. Bor'ba s nedobrosovestnoy konkurentsiey kak stimuliruyushchiy faktor razvitiya promyshlennosti i predprinimatel'stva [Fight against unfair competition as a stimulating factor in the development of industry and entrepreneurship]. Normirovanie i oplata truda v promyshlennosti [Rationing and wages in industry]. 2019, I. 7, pp. 66–72.
2. Bykova O.N., Zamirovich E.N. Innovatsionnye aspekty strategii sotsial'no-ekonomicheskogo razvitiya na mezourovne [Innovative aspects of the strategy of socio-economic development at the meso-level]. Moscow: RGIIS Publ., 2008. 302 p.
3. Garnova V.Yu. Upravlenie konkurentosposobnost'yu promyshlennykh predpriyatiy v usloviyakh globalizatsii ekonomiki [Management of the competitiveness of industrial enterprises in the context of economic globalization]. RISK: Resursy, informatsiya, snabzhenie, konkurentsiya [RISK: Resources, information, supply, competition]. 2011, I. 2, pp. 181–183.
4. Garnova V.Yu. Problemy investitsionnoy privlekatel'nosti promyshlennosti v regionakh Rossii [Problems of investment attractiveness of industry in the regions of Russia]. Nauchnye issledovaniya i razrabotki. Ekonomika firmy [Scientific research and development. The economy of the company]. 2013, V. 2, I. 1, pp. 4–6. DOI: 10.12737/298
5. Garnova V.Yu., Garnov A.P., Chaykovskiy A.M. Investitsionnaya politika kak odin iz ekonomicheskikh aspektov razvitiya neftegazovogo sektora [Investment policy as one of the economic aspects of the oil and gas sector development]. Nauchnye issledovaniya i razrabotki. Ekonomika firmy [Scientific research and development. The economy of the company]. 2015, V. 4, I. 1, pp. 61–67. DOI: 10.12737/13545.
6. Parizhskoe soglashenie ot 22 aprelya 2016 g.: prinyato 12 dekabrya 2015 g. v ramkakh Ramochnoy konventsii OON ob izmenenii klimata 12 dekabrya 2015 g. [Paris Agreement of April 22, 2016: adopted on December 12, 2015 within the framework of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change on December 12, 2015].
7. Preobrazovanie nashego mira: Povestka dnya v oblasti ustoychivogo razvitiya na period do 2030 goda ot 21 oktyabrya 2015 g.: rezolyutsiya General'noy Assamblei OON: prinyato 25 sentyabrya 2015 g. v ramkakh 70-y sessii [Transforming Our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development of October 21, 2015: Resolution of the UN General Assembly: adopted on September 25, 2015 in the framework of the 70th session].
8. Garnov A.P. Rol' innovatsiy v ekonomicheskom razvitii Rossii [The role of innovations in the economic development of Russia]. Moscow: Rusayns, 2019. 110 p.
9. Aupperle K.E., Carroll A.B., Hatfield J.D. An empirical examination of the relationship between corporate social responsibility and profitability. Acad. Manage. J. 1985. 28 (2), 446–463.
10. Barnett M.L. Stakeholder influence capacity and the variability of financial returns to corporate social responsibility. Acad. Manage. Rev. 2007. 32 (3), 794–816.
11. Devinney T.M. Is the socially responsible corporation a myth? The good, the bad, and the ugly of corporate social responsibility. The Academy of Management Perspectives. 2009. 23 (2), 44–56.
12. Dombrovskis V. Speech by Vice-President Valdis Dombrovskis at the Euro fi Financial Forum 2016, Bratislava [Elektronnyy resurs]. Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/SPEECH_16_2993 (accessed 03 May 2021).
13. Eurosif, 2016. European SRI Study 2016, European SRI Study. [Elektronnyy resurs]. Available at: http://www.eurosif.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/SRI-study–2016-HR.pdf (accessed 02 May 2021).
14. Mal'shina N.A., Garnov A.P. Modern principles analysis of resource flows in crisis conditions: culture and creative industry // San Francisco, Academus Publ., 2020, pt. 1, 101 p. DOI: 10.31519/978–1–4946-0018–1
15. Fletcher L. Hedge funds join the hunt for the ESG ‘factor.’ Financial Times. 2019.
16. Freeman R.E. Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. PitmanPublishing Inc., Marchfield, MA. 1984. 276 p.
17. Friedman M. A theoretical framework for monetary analysis. Journal of Political Economy.1970. 78 (2), 193–238.
18. Forzieri G., Bianchi A., Marin H. M., Batista E., Silva F., Feyen L, Lavalle C. Resilience of large investments and critical infrastructures in Europe to climate change. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. 2015. 178 p. DOI: 10.2788/171858
19. Garnova V., Garnov A., Khudyakov S. Russia and the EU: about the features of pragmatism. Nauchnye issledovaniya i razrabotki. Ekonomika firmy [Scientific research and development. The economy of the company.]. 2016, V. 5, I. 2, pp. 50–55.
20. Gross A. Chart of the week. Financial Times. 2019
21. Jo H., Harjoto M.A. Corporate governance and firm value: The impact of corporate social responsibility. J. Bus. Ethics. 2011. 103 (3), 351–383.
22. Jones T.M. Instrumental stakeholder theory: A synthesis of ethics and economics. Acad. Manage. Rev. 1995. 20 (2), 404–437.
23. Lee L-E. Moscardi M. 2019 ESGtrendstowatc. MSCI. Available at: https://www.msci.com/documents/10199/239004/MSCI–2019-ESG-Trends-to-Watch.pdf (accessed 05 May 2021).
24. Garnov A.P., Bykova O.N., Repnikova V.M. Methods of conditioning sustainable growth programs of power generating companies // E3S Web of Conferences (sm. v knigakh). 2020. S. 05073.
25. Mooney A. ESG wake-up call for pension laggards. Financial Times. 2018.
26. Porter M.E., Kramer M.R. The link between competitive advantage and corporate social responsibility. Harvard business review. 2006. 84, 78–92.
27. PRI, UNEP FI, UNEP INQUIRY and UN Global Compact, 2015. Fiduciary Duty in the 21st Century [Elektronnyy resurs]. Available at: https://www.unepfi.org/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/Fiduciary-duty–21st-century-final-report.pdf (accessed 02 May 2021).
28. Robinson-Tillett S. PRI kicks off analysis on investment implications of climate policy [Elektronnyy resurs] // Responsible Investor. Available at: https://www.responsible-investor.com/articles/pri-kicks-off-analysis-on-investment-implications-of-climate-policy (accessed 10 May 2021).
29. Ruf B.M., Muralidhar K., Brown R.M., Janney J.J., Paul K. An empirical investigation of the relationship between change in corporate social performance and financial performance: a stakeholder theory perspective. J. Bus. Ethics. 2001. 32 (2), 143–156.
30. Russo M.V., Fouts P.A. A resource-based perspective on corporate environmental performance and profitability. Acad. Manage. 1997. J. 40 (3), 534–559.
31. Share Action. A Manifesto for Responsible Investment. [Elektronnyy resurs]. Available at: https://shareaction.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/Manifesto.pdf (accessed 02 May 2021).
32. Temple-West P. Ethical pressures boost ESG funds. Financial Times. 2019.
33. The Economist Intelligence Unit. The cost of inaction: Recognising the value at risk from climate change [Elektronnyy resurs]. Available at: https://biotech.law.lsu.edu/blog/The-cost-of-inaction_0.pdf (accessed 03 May 2021).
34. University of Cambridge: Institute for Sustainable Leadership. Unhedgeable risk: How climate change sentiment impacts investment [Elektronnyy resurs]. Available at: https://www.cisl.cam.ac.uk/resources/publication-pdfs/unhedgeable-risk.pdf (accessed 03 May 2021).
35. United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs (UNDESA). Financing for sustainable developmentin the global partnership beyond 2015. [Elektronnyy resurs]. Available at: https://www.un.org/en/development/desa/policy/untaskteam_undf/thinkpieces/21_thinkpiece_financing_development.pdf (accessed 02 May 2021)
