from 01.01.2012 to 01.01.2021
Moscow, Russian Federation
UDK 343 Уголовное право. Уголовное судопроизводство. Криминология. Криминалистика
In this article one can find examples of the analytical work based on a current terminology of a word “graffiti”, that can be found in scientific research works on this phenomenon in the fields of sociology, psychology, art and law. Current classifications of this notion are analyzed taking into account the content of these objects, their attitude to a graffiti community and a certain author, motivation and outward. Analysis considers materials and tools used for a certain object implementation. These writing tools in some cases determine the type of graffiti. The main objective of this analysis was the need to identify certain classified objects the ones that might be necessary for a handwriting expertise and to determine of the relations between the notions of “graffiti” and “handwritten objects made with the use of unconventional writing materials”. During the analysis, a number of characteristics that can be used as a support for conducting handwritten expertise of considered object were defined and conclusions for those graffiti objects that meet these criteria were drawn.
graffiti, styles and variants of graffiti, object for handwritten expertise, handwritten objects performed with the use of uncommon writing materials
1. Nebratenko G. G. Nanesenie graffiti kak sposob soversheniya prestupleniy / Regulirovanie migracionnyh processov na yuge Rossii: politicheskie, yuridicheskie i pravoohranitel'nye aspekty : sbornik materialov Vserossiyskoy nauchno-teoreticheskoy konferencii. – Rostov-na-Donu: RYuI MVD Rossii, 2016. – S. 34–38.
2. Belkin A. I. Issledovanie graffiti v psihologii i intencional'nost' soznaniya avtorov graffiti // Kreativnaya ekonomika i social'nye innovacii. – 2012. – № 1 (2). – S. 36–54.
3. Kurbatova T. N., Vasil'eva R. S. Graffiti: subkul'tura ili vandalizm // Psihologiya i pravo. – 2013. – № 2. – S. 22–32.
4. Penetova E. V. Graffiti kak fenomen gorodskoy kul'tury. Iskusstvo ili vandalizm? // Vestnik Prikamskogo social'nogo instituta. – 2016. – № 2 (74). – S. 89–92.
5. Vorotnikova A. I., Denisenko K. A., Eliseeva V. M. Graffiti – iskusstvo ili vandalizm? / Formirovanie gumanitarnoy sredy v vuze: innovacionnye obrazovatel'nye tehnologii. Kompetentnostnyy podhod. – T. 3. – Perm': Permskiy nacional'nyy issledovatel'skiy politehnicheskiy universitet, 2013. – S. 210–215.
6. Trifonova K. A., Gafurov M. Yu. Graffiti: iskusstvo ili pravonarushenie / Aktual'nye voprosy teorii i praktiki v deyatel'nosti podrazdeleniy policii : materialy vnutrivedomstvennogo nauchno-prakticheskogo seminara. – Moskva: Olimp, 2017. – S. 137–141.
7. Bashkatov I. P., Strelkova T. S. Harakteristiki molodezhno-podrostkovogo graffiti // Sociologicheskie issledovaniya. – 2006. – № 11. – S. 141–145.
8. Lantuh E. V. Ispol'zovanie special'nyh znaniy v oblasti graffiti pri rassledovanii prestupleniy / Deyatel'nost' pravoohranitel'nyh organov v sovremennyh usloviyah : sbornik materialov HH Mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferencii (g. Irkutsk, 28–29 maya 2015 g.). – Irkutsk : Vostochno-Sibirskiy institut MVD Rossii, 2015. – S. 13–17.
9. Zhizhina M. V. Taktiko-metodicheskie osnovy sledstvennogo osmotra i naznacheniya ekspertizy v otnoshenii dokumenta na bumazhnom nositele // Vestnik Universiteta imeni O. E. Kutafina (MGYuA). – 2021. – № (2). – S. 124–131. https://doi.org/10.17803/2311-5998.2021.78.2.124-131
10. Bobovkin M. V., Ruchkin V. A. Osnovnye tendencii razvitiya sudebno-pocherkovedcheskoy ekspertizy v Rossiyskoy Federacii // Sudebnaya ekspertiza. – 2018. – № 1 (53). – S. 33–41.
