graduate student from 01.01.2018 to 01.01.1921
Krasnodar, Krasnodar, Russian Federation
UDK 34 Право. Юридические науки
GRNTI 10.77 Уголовное право
The article deals with the concept and features of damage as a qualifying sign of abuse (corpus delicti) in the procurement of goods, works and services ensuring state or municipal needs. The subjective and objective criteria necessary to define the concept of «major damage» are revealed. The problem of qualification of acts containing signs of abuse in the field under consideration and delimitation of Art. 2004 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation from related offenses are touched upon. The issue of the validity of establishing the amounts of major and especially major damage for the qualification of the crime in question is analyzed. Based on statistical data, the average cost of one procurement item to ensure state or municipal needs is calculated. The most common methods of determining the supplier (contractor, performer) are identified. Various approaches and points of view of scientists concerning the issues of determining the amounts of major and especially major damage caused when committing abuses in the procurement of goods, works and services for state or municipal needs are analyzed. The author formulates his position on the problems arising in connection with the unreasonableness of the established amounts of major and especially major damage caused by committing abuses in the field studied.
state procurements, state procurement crimes, economic crimes, corruption crimes, corpus delicti, damage
1. Borkov V. N. Ugolovno-pravovoe preduprezhdenie korrupcii. – Omsk: Omskaya akademiya MVD Rossii, 2014. – 172 s.
2. Gladkih V. I. Zloupotrebleniya v sfere zakupok tovarov, rabot, uslug dlya obespecheniya gosudarstvennyh ili municipal'nyh nuzhd (st. 2004 UK RF): teoreticheskiy analiz // Rossiyskaya yusticiya. – 2019. – № 3. – S. 51–54.
3. Gauhman L. D. Sootnoshenie krupnogo razmera i krupnogo uscherba po UK RF // Zakonnost'. – 2001. – № 1. – S. 32–35.
4. Shkabin G. S. Vred v ugolovnom prave: vidy i pravovoe regulirovanie // Problemy otrasley prava. – 2016. – № 8. – S. 62–79.
5. Bykov A. V. Otdel'nye problemy kriminalizacii korrupcionnyh deyaniy, sovershaemyh v sfere sluzhebnyh otnosheniy (razmyshleniya o st. 2004, 2005 UK RF) / Sluzhebnye prestupleniya: voprosy teorii i praktiki pravoprimeneniya : sb. materialov Mezhdunar. nauch.-prakt. konf. (17 maya 2018 g.) / pod red. T. B. Basovoy, K. A. Volkova. – Habarovsk: Yurist, 2018. – S. 34–40.
6. Samsonov V. N. O differenciacii ugolovnoy otvetstvennosti za dolzhnostnye prestupleniya v sfere zakupok tovarov, rabot, uslug dlya obespecheniya gosudarstvennyh ili municipal'nyh nuzhd // Rossiyskiy sledovatel'. – 2018. – № 12. – S. 52–56.
7. Isyutin-Fedotkov D. V. O nekotoryh problemah privlecheniya k ugolovnoy otvetstvennosti za zloupotrebleniya v sfere gosudarstvennyh zakupok // PROGOSZAKAZ.RF. – 2018. – № 7. – S. 46–53.
8. Bavsun M. V., Borkov V. N. Novye ugolovno-pravovye mery ohrany otnosheniy v sfere zakupok dlya gosudarstvennyh nuzhd // Sovremennoe pravo. – 2018. – № 9. – S. 90–94.
9. Pinkevich T. V. Protivodeystvie ekonomicheskoy prestupnosti v sovremennoy Rossii / Ugolovnaya politika na sovremennom etape: sostoyanie, tendencii, perspektivy : sb. st. Mezhdunar. nauch.-prakt. konf. / redkol.: M. Yu. Voronin (predsedatel') i dr. – Moskva: Akademiya upravleniya MVD Rossii, 2018. – S. 151–157.
10. Chernyakov S. A., Curkin V. S. Osobennosti kvalifikacii zloupotrebleniya v sfere zakupok tovarov, rabot, uslug dlya obespecheniya gosudarstvennyh ili municipal'nyh nuzhd // Vestnik Kaliningradskogo filiala Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta MVD Rossii. – 2019. – № 2 (56). – S. 44–47.
11. Lavrov V. P., Lapin V. O. Prestupleniya v sfere zakupok tovarov, rabot, uslug dlya obespecheniya gosudarstvennyh i municipal'nyh nuzhd: voprosy vyyavleniya i rassledovaniya // Vestnik Nizhegorodskoy akademii MVD Rossii. – 2017. – № 2 (38). – S. 108–113.
