Moskva, Moscow, Russian Federation
Moskva, Moscow, Russian Federation
The authors of the article, analyzing the experience of the implementation of educational programs for bachelor's, master's and programs of additional professional education in the field of personnel management, focus on the assessment of learning processes and its new aspects, the emergence of which is associated both with the development of learning formats and technologies, and with changes in regulatory and legal requirements for the content and conditions for the implementation of educational programs. The study made it possible to determine the main contours of the assessment of educational programs in the field of personnel management, including indicators and criteria of efficiency, subjects of assessment, the possibility of increasing the level of innovation, as well as to highlight a number of areas for further development and refinement of assessment elements, including the integration of formats and assessment results the effectiveness of educational programs conducted by various subjects and having a different nature of the obligation (state accreditation, independent professional and public accreditation), reflected in the criteria and procedures for assessing the increase in the use of new educational technologies, taking into account delayed learning outcomes.
independent assessment of qualifications, educational programs, educational standard, performance assessment, professional and public accreditation
1. Alba-Hidalgo, D., Benayas del Álamo, J., Gutiérrez-Pérez, J. (2018). Towards a definition of environmental sustainability evaluation in higher education. High. Educ. Policy. 31 (4), 447–470.
2. Bendermacher, G., oude Egbrink, M., Wolfhagen, I., Dolmans, D. (2017). Unravelling quality culture in higher education: a realist review. High. Educ. 73(1), 39–60.
3. Cahapay, M. (2021). Kirkpatrick Model: Its Limitations as Used in Higher Education Evaluation. International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education. 8. 135–144. 10.21449/ijate.856143.
4. Council for Professional Qualifications in the field of HR Management (CPQ HRM): professional and public accreditation (2021). http://sovethr.ru/poa-sovethr.
5. Federal Law of 29.12.2012 No. 273-FZ «On education in the Russian Federation». http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_140174.
6. Konovalova V.G., Fedotova M.A., Bình I. (2020). Professional and Public Accreditation of HR Management Educational Programs: Prospects and Challenges. In: Ashmarina S.I., Mantulenko V.V. (eds). Digital Economy and the New Labor Market: Jobs, Competences and Innovative HR Technologies. IPM 2020. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 161. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978–3-030–60926–9_27 (2021)
7. Lohman, L. (2021) Evaluation of University Teaching as Sound Performance Appraisal. Stud. Educ. Eval. 70. 10.1016/j.stueduc.2021.101008.
8. Lucander H., Christersson C. (2020). Engagement for quality development in higher education: a process for quality assurance of assessment. Qual. High. Educ. 26:2, 135–155, DOI: 10.1080/13538322.2020.1761008
9. Margarov G., Konovalova V. (2019). Interdisciplinary Competencies Needed for Engineers in the Digital Economy. 144–147. 10.1109/CSITechnol.2019.8895029
10. National Agency of the Qualifications Development: Professional and public accreditation is a guarantee of the training quality (NAQD) (2021). https://nark.ru/news/za-professionalno-obshchestvennuyu-akkreditatsiyu-.php.
11. Nizhegorodtsev R.M., Reznik S.D. (eds). Higher education in Russia: challenges and look into the future. Moscow, INFRA-M, 2020.
12. Previtali P., Cerchiello P. (2021). Corporate governance and the responsiveness of organisations to a change in accreditation standards. Qual. High. Educ. 27:1, 123–133, DOI: 10.1080/13538322.2020.1833417.
13. Reio T.G., Rocco T.S., Smith D.H., & Chang E. (2017). A Critique of Kirkpatrick’s Evaluation Model. New Horizons in Adult Education & Human Resource Development 29(2), 35–53. https://doi.org/10.1002/nha3.20178 (2017).
14. Salto D. (2018). Quality assurance through accreditation: when resistance meets over compliance. High. Edu. Q. 72, 78–89.
15. Staub D. (2019). Another accreditation? what’s the point?’ effective planning and implementation for specialised accreditation. Qual. High. Educ. 25(2), 171–90.
16. Strategy for development of national qualifications system in Russian Federation for the period until 2030. Approved by the Presidential National Council for Professional Qualifications 12.03.2021. https://nspkrf.ru/documents/2808-strategiya-razvitiya-nacional'noy-sistemy-kvalifikaciy-rossiyskoy-federacii-na-period-do–2030-goda/file.html.
17. Tezcan-Unal B., Winston K. & Quaker A. (2018). Learning-oriented quality assurance in higher education institutions. Qual. High. Educ. 24(3), 221–37.
18. Tikhonov A.I. (2020). Corporate training programs in Russian and foreign companies: impact on staff and time challenges. International Journal of Higher Education. 9 (3), 183–189.
19. Vlasova O., Konovalova V., Fedotova M. (2021). Relevance and Objectives of Carrying Out Professional and Public Accreditation of Educational Programs in the Field of Human Resource Management. Management of the Personnel and Intellectual Resources in Russia. 10. 36–42. 10.12737/2305–7807–2021–10–3–36–42.
20. Zelentsova L., Tikhonov A. (2020). A Methodology for Assessing the Innovative Potential of a High-Tech Organization under the Economy Digitalization Impact. QUALITY – Access to Success. 21 (174), 7–13.
