Moskva, Moscow, Russian Federation
The construction of new, market-based economic relations in Russia in the early 90s of the last century was accompanied by a radical transformation of the education system to the Bologna standard. At the same time, Western scientists - teachers drew attention to the work on the cognitive development of the child by L.S. Vygotsky, the theory of developmental education by P.Ya. Galperin, the theory of inventive problem solving by G.S. Altshuller and the results of research by other scientists providing the formation of systems thinking in Soviet education. The article shows that the documents regulating the development of Russian education include the formation of systematic and critical thinking in students, but in practice this is not always implemented. The directions of transformation of the Russian education system since the beginning of building market relations in the 90s of the last century are identified as the cause of the current situation. The formation of systems thinking in higher education should consider the peculiarities of the age dynamics of adults. The most developed figurative and verbal thinking among students makes it possible to use the teaching methods of V.F. Shatalov, which reduces the time for studying educational materials by more than 30 times in comparison with classical teaching methods.
education, rapidly changing conditions, systems thinking, critical thinking, management decision making
1. Arnol'd V.I. Podgotovka novoy kul'turnoy revolyucii. URL: http://www.emomi.com/download/sadovnichiy/arnold2.htm (data obrascheniya: 29.10.2021)
2. Boguslavskiy M.V. Innovacionnye i retroinnovacionnye volny v sovremennoy rossiyskoy obrazovatel'noy politike: potencial i riski // Narodnoe obrazovanie. 2018. № 6–7. S. 7–10.
3. Vinogradov S.N. Istoriya Rossii. Kratkiy kurs. Fil'm 1. URL: http://shatalovschools.ru/korzina/tovary.php (Data obrascheniya: 31.10.2021)
4. Danilov A.A. Istoriya Rossii. Rabochie programmy. Predmetnaya liniya uchebnikov «Sfera». 6–9 klassy: posobie dlya uchiteley obscheobrazovatel'nyh uchrezhdeniy. – M.: Prosveschenie, 2011. – 128 s.
5. Ivanova S.V., Serikov V.V. Strategiya razvitiya obrazovaniya kak predmet mezhdisciplinarnogo issledovaniya // Pedagogika. – 2017. – № 2. – S. 3–12.
6. Knyazeva E. Sistemnyy podhod kak osnova strategicheskogo upravleniya // Forsayt. – 2020. – T. 14. – № 4. – S. 6–8. DOI: 10.17323/2500–2597.2020.4.6.8
7. Luk'yanenko V.P. Priznaki sistemnogo krizisa v obrazovanii v Rossii i ih analiz //Narodnoe obrazovanie. 2017. № 5. S. 7–16.
8. Osnovy andragogiki / Pod red. I.A. Kolesnikovoy. – M.: ACADEMIA, 2007. – 240 s.
9. Hagurov T.A., Ostapenko A.A. Pragmatizaciya ili lyubov'? Kak kompetentnostnyy podhod ubivaet lyuboznatel'nost', trudolyubie i chelovekolyubie //Narodnoe obrazovanie. 2017. № 6–7. S. 18–23.
10. Shkola – studiya Shatalova. Oficial'nyy sayt. URL: http://www.shatalovschools.ru / (Data obrascheniya: 31.10.2021)
11. Kononiuk A., Sacio-Szymańska A., Ollenburg S., Trivelli L. (2021) Teaching Foresight and Futures Literacy and Its Integration into University Curriculum. Foresight and STI Governance, 15(3), 105–121. DOI: 10.17323/2500–2597.2021.3.105.121
12. Mainzer K. (2020) Technology Foresight and Sustainable Innovation Development in the Complex Dynamical Systems View. Foresight and STI Governance, vol. 14, no 4, pp. 10–19. DOI: 10.17323/2500–2597.2020.4.10.19
13. Milovidov V. (2020) The «Linked Prosperity» Model as an Integrated Response to Corporate Management Challenges in a Network Society. Foresight and STI Governance, vol. 14, no 4, pp. 112–120. DOI: 10.17323/2500–2597.2020.4.112.120
14. Swanson H., Collins A. (2019) Learning to Theorize in a Complex and Changing World. Foresight and STI Governance, vol. 13, no 2, pp. 98–106. DOI: 10.17323/2500–2597.2019.2.98.106
15. Wiesmeth H. (2020) Systemic Change: The Complexity of Business in a Circular Economy. Foresight and STI Governance, vol. 14, no 4, pp. 47–60. DOI: 10.17323/2500–2597.2020.4.47.60
