UDK 343.953 Психология совершения преступления. Психология преступника
The article deals with social and personal aspects of the impact of criminal punishment on the interaction of criminals with the social environment. It is shown that social interaction is an important factor in the formation of criminal orientation and a key condition for resocialization of criminals. It is noted that criminal orientation is formed and manifests itself in social interaction. Key importance for its strengthening and weakening has the nearest social environment, including family members, relatives and friends. It is stated that criminal punishment has an impact on social and personal aspects of social interaction of persons brought to criminal responsibility. Social consequences are determined by the attitude of society to the crime and the offender. Social perceptions establish attitudes, stereotypes and attitudes in the interaction with criminals. At the same time, social perceptions are contradictory, because they belong to different social strata, communities and social groups of society. The personal consequences of the impact of criminal punishment on the interaction with the social environment include changes in self-concept and self-esteem, as well as the state of the needs-motivational sphere. Their psychological consequences are characterized. The conclusion is made that the self-perception and self-esteem of criminals has formation defects that affect the perception of the social attitude to the crime, hindering the experience of guilt for its commission. It is shown that criminal prosecution strengthens the contradictions in the self-perception and regulation of the needs-motivational spheres of personality. The specificity of self-attitude is caused by the contradiction between the maintenance of positive selfimage (positive «I-image» and high self-esteem) and avoidance of taking responsibility for the committed crime in combination with negative social ideas about the crime and the offender. The conclusion is made about the prospects of research of social interaction of persons who have been subjected to criminal prosecution as a resource of prevention of their re-criminalization.
psychology of the criminal, social space, social interaction, crime prevention, social relations
1. Akopyan L. S. Trevozhnost' i strahi zhenschin v mestah lisheniya svobody // Vestnik Samarskogo yuridicheskogo instituta. – 2015. – № 2 (16). – S. 115–119.
2. Busygin N. I., Verbina G. G. Social'no-psihologicheskie aspekty adaptacii osuzhdennyh posle osvobozhdeniya iz mest lisheniya svobody // Sovremennye tendencii razvitiya nauki i tehnologiy. – 2017. – № 2–10. – S. 35–38.
3. Vetra A. V. Teoretiko-metodologicheskiy analiz samosoznaniya podozrevaemyh i obvinyaemyh za nasil'stvennye prestupleniya / Psihologiya XXI veka: vyzovy, poiski, vektory razvitiya. – Ryazan': Akademiya prava i upravleniya Federal'noy sluzhby ispolneniya nakazaniy, 2019. – S. 360–366.
4. Gorban' D. V., Efremova O. S. Konceptual'naya teoreticheskaya model' ugolovno-ispolnitel'noy harakteristiki lichnosti osuzhdennogo k lisheniyu svobody // Pravo i politika. – 2019. – № 3. – S. 21–32. DOI: 10.7256/2454-0706.2019.3.22937.
5. Danilin E., Naumov S. Resocializaciya osuzhdennyh v koloniyah-poseleniyah v processe sovmestnogo prozhivaniya s sem'ey // Vedomosti UIS. – 2003. – № 7. – S. 30–33.
6. Zlokazov K. V. Konstruirovanie identichnosti i kriminalizaciya lichnosti : monografiya. – Ekaterinburg: Ural'skiy yuridicheskiy institut MVD Rossii, 2017. – 142 s.
7. Zyukov A. M. Antiobschestvennye tradicii, obychai i privychki razlichnyh etnicheskih grupp // Sovremennoe pravo. – 2010. – № 5. – S. 124 –127.
8. Kohman D. V., Dobrov D. A. Nekotorye osobennosti trudoustroystva osuzhdennyh k nakazaniyu v vide ispravitel'nyh rabot: opyt Rossii i stran SNG // Vestnik Voronezhskogo instituta FSIN Rossii. – 2021. – № 1. – S. 172–179.
9. Kroz M. V., Ratinova N. A. Osobennosti samoocenki korrupcionnyh prestupnikov // Prikladnaya yuridicheskaya psihologiya. – 2018. – № 4 (45). – S. 23–31.
10. Kudryavcev V. N. Pravovoe povedenie: norma i patologiya. – Moskva: Nauka, 1982. – 287 s.
11. Kuznecova O. V. Struktura deyatel'nosti delinkventnoy lichnosti (na primere lic, obvinyaemyh v sovershenii osobo tyazhkih prestupleniy) // Pedagogicheskoe obrazovanie na Altae. – 2014.– № 2. – S. 464–465.
12. Kulakova V. A. Organizovannaya prestupnost' i deyanie, predusmotrennoe stat'ey 2101 ugolovnogo kodeksa Rossiyskoy Federacii / Pravovaya sistema Rossii: istoriya, sovremennost', tendencii razvitiya : sbornik materialov VIII zaochnoy Vserossiyskoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferencii. – Blagoveschensk: Amurskiy gosudarstvennyy universitet, 2021. – S. 80–92. – DOI 10.22250/LSR.2021.10.
13. Latysheva L. A. Osobennosti resocializacii zhenschin, osuzhdennyh k lisheniyu svobody // Vestnik instituta: prestuplenie, nakazanie, ispravlenie. – 2014. – № 2 (26). – S. 94–98.
14. Novikova Yu. V. Tipologicheskie shemy lichnosti prestupnika v strukture kriminologicheskoy harakteristiki prestupnosti (prestupleniy) // Obschestvo i pravo. – 2021. – № 2 (76). – S. 32–37.
15. Sitkovskaya O. D., Konysheva L. P. Psihologicheskaya ekspertiza nesovershennoletnih v ugolovnom processe : nauchno-metodicheskoe posobie. – Moskva: Izdatel'stvo Universiteta prokuratury, 2001. – 72 s.
16. Sochivko D. V., Sochivko O. I. K voprosu o psihologicheskih osobennostyah osuzhdennyh / Ugolovno-ispolnitel'naya sistema segodnya: vzaimodeystvie nauki i praktiki. – Novokuzneck: Kuzbasskiy institut Federal'noy sluzhby ispolneniya nakazaniy, 2021. – S. 139–141.
17. Suchkova E. L. Predstavleniya o pravovoy deystvitel'nosti uslovno osuzhdennyh // Prikladnaya yuridicheskaya psihologiya. – 2012. – № 3. – S. 153–161.
18. Chernysheva E. V. Kriminologicheskie i psihologicheskie pokazateli lichnosti osuzhdennogo // Pashi: nauchnyy psihologicheskiy zhurnal / Ural'skiy gosudarstvennyy pedagogicheskiy universitet (Ekaterinburg), – 2005. – № 2 (12). – S. 191–209.
19. Shkarlet N. A. Teoriya i praktika ucheta sudom lichnosti podsudimogo pri uslovnom osuzhdenii // Rossiyskoe pravosudie. – 2019. – № 10. – S. 101–105. – DOI 10.17238/issn2072-909X.2019.10.101-105. – EDN SNTZDJ.
20. Asencio E. K. & Burke P. J. Does incarceration change the criminal identity? A synthesis of labeling and identity theory perspectives on identity change // Sociological Perspectives. – 2011. – № 54. – R. 163–182.
21. Boduszek D., Hyland P. The Theoretical Model of Criminal Social Identity: Psycho-social perspective // International Journal of Criminology and Sociological Theory. – 2011. – № 4. – R. 604–615.
22. Dawes A. (1992). Political and moral learning in contexts of political conflict. Paper presented at the Course on Mental health of children exposed to violent environments, Refugee Studies Programme, University of Oxford, 6th -10th January.
23. LeBel T. P., Burnett R., Maruna S. & Bushway S. D. The “chicken and egg” of subjective and social factors in desistance from crime // European Journal of Criminology. – 2008. – № 5. – R. 131–159.
24. Strocka C. (2008). In Search of Identity. – Germany: VDM Verlag.
25. Sykes G. M., Matza D. Techniques of neutralization: a theory of delinquency // American Sociological Review. – 1957. – № 22. – R. 664–670.
