graduate student from 01.01.2021 until now
Russian Federation
UDK 343.121 Обвиняемый. Право на защиту
UDK 347.965 Адвокаты
The presence of a lawyer in a criminal process is the most effective means of protecting the suspect (accused), since it is the defender who can provide qualified legal assistance. The problematic issues of the participation of a defense counsel in a criminal case have been studied for a long time. At the same time, the versatility of the topic under consideration objectively determines the fact that not all issues have been studied in an exhaustive way. In particular, certain aspects of inviting and appointing a defense lawyer, the procedural registration of the actions of the investigator to provide a defense counsel to the accused (suspect) continue to be controversial. The main purpose of the article is to resolve the problematic issues of the appointment and entry of a defense counsel into a criminal case. The procedure for the entry of this participant into the criminal process is complicated by a dual nature: in the procedural plan, the moment the defense attorney begins to participate is inextricably linked with the activities of the investigator (interrogating officer), and in organizational matters - with the decision of the legal community authorizing the lawyer to defend. In connection with the existence of two ways of the appearance of a defense counsel in a criminal case, the article presents a distinction between the essence of defense by agreement and by appointment. Topical issues of procedural registration of the status of a defender in criminal proceedings are also considered. The author proposes recommendations for improving the criminal procedural legislation in terms of regulating the procedure for the entry of a defense counsel and his activities in the framework of the criminal process, attempts are made to unify law enforcement practice on the procedural fixing of the moment the defense attorney begins to participate.
lawyer, defense counsel by invitation, defense counsel by appointment, intervention in a case, qualified legal assistance, stage of preliminary investigation, criminal proceedings
1. Bogdanovskaya V. A. Problema «passivnoy zaschity» v ramkah osuschestvleniya prava na poluchenie kvalificirovannoy yuridicheskoy pomoschi // Uchenye zapiski Kazanskogo filiala Rossiyskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta pravosudiya. – 2019. – T. 15. – S. 50–57.
2. Gladysheva O. V. Obespechenie prava na kvalificirovannuyu yuridicheskuyu pomosch' v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve: sovremennye problemy i puti ih resheniya / Effektivnoe protivodeystvie prestupnosti v usloviyah globalizacii: problemy i perspektivy : sbornik materialov Mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferencii. – Krasnodar, Krasnodarskiy universitet MVD Rossii, 2020. – S. 10–20.
3. Kondrat I. N. Obespechenie prava na kvalificirovannuyu yuridicheskuyu pomosch' v sfere ugolovnogo processa // Zakonodatel'stvo. – 2012. – № 4. – S. 76–83.
4. Kostrica Ya. A. Pravo podozrevaemogo (obvinyaemogo) na kvalificirovannuyu yuridicheskuyu pomosch' kak element prava na zaschitu / Prava cheloveka i pravoohranitel'naya deyatel'nost' (pamyati professora A. V. Zinov'eva) : sbornik materialov regional'noy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferencii. – Sankt-Peterburg: Sankt-Peterburgskiy universitet MVD Rossii, 2017. – S. 97–101.
5. Larin E. G. Obespechenie prava na kvalificirovannuyu yuridicheskuyu pomosch' v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve // Nauchnyy vestnik Omskoy akademii MVD Rossii. – 2013. – № 4. – S. 21–25.
6. Mel'nichenko R. G. Kachestvo yuridicheskoy pomoschi advokata «po naznacheniyu» // Ugolovnyy process. – 2013. – № 5. – S. 30–39.
7. Otchercova O. V. Nepravomernye deystviya zaschitnikov po naznacheniyu // Ugolovnyy process. – 2016. – № 8. – S. 44–49.
8. Ovchinnikov Yu. G., Kuzora S. A. Problemy uchastiya «inogo» lica v kachestve zaschitnika v dosudebnyh stadiyah ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva // Rossiyskaya yusticiya. – 2014. – № 11. – S. 43–44.
9. Kostanov Yu. A. O neotlozhnyh izmeneniyah i dopolneniyah UPK RF // Sayt «Prava cheloveka v Rossii: elektronnyy arhiv materialov». – URL: http://www.hro.org/docs/expert/kostanov-upk-0302.php, 2002 (data obrascheniya: 27.07.2022).
10. Gliskov A. G., Gliskov A. A., Zabeyvorota A. I. Spravochnik advokata po ugolovnym delam. Zaschita podozrevaemyh. Predstavlenie interesov poterpevshih. Obrazcy processual'nyh dokumentov : monografiya / pod red. S. N. Baburina. – Moskva: Knizhnyy mir, 2011. – 367 s.
11. Otchercova O. V. Problema dopuska advokata k uchastiyu v ugolovnom dele // Voprosy rossiyskogo i mezhdunarodnogo prava. – 2016. – № 7. – S. 107–123.
12. Esina A. S., Zhamkova O. E., Borbat A. V. Kak pravil'no ponimat' novye pravila o vstuplenii advokata v ugolovnoe delo? // Rossiyskiy sledovatel'. – 2017. – № 20. – S. 17–21.
13. Endol'ceva A. V. Realizaciya konstitucionnogo prava na poluchenie kvalificirovannoy yuridicheskoy pomoschi v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve Rossii // Ugolovnoe sudoproizvodstvo. – 2019. – № 4. – S. 25–30.
14. Stel'mah V. Yu. Nekotorye problemy realizacii konstitucionnogo prava na okazanie kvalificirovannoy yuridicheskoy pomoschi // Problemy pravoohranitel'noy deyatel'nosti. – 2015. – № 4. – S. 44–48.
