graduate student from 01.01.2021 until now
UDK 303 Методы общественных наук
The article raises the problem of Orientalism, which manifests itself in the difference between the axiological and epistemological approaches to Western and Eastern intellectual heritage in Russian jurisprudence. The purpose of the study is to determine the degree of legitimacy of the Orientalist approach and to outline the methodological basis that will make it possible to realize the need of the domestic theory of law in a dialogue with the legal thought of the East. The goal is achieved by answering questions about the possibility, expediency and boundaries of an equal dialogue with the political and legal thought of the East within the framework of the general theory of law. To prove the possibility of dialogue, episodic examples of the dialogic approach in domestic jurisprudence are identified and four types of goals are identified for which scientists enter into a dialogue with the legal heritage of the East: problem setting, criticism, rehabilitation of Eastern thought, substantiation of theoretical provisions. To prove the expediency and necessity of a dialogue with Eastern thought, the principles of scientific knowledge, methodological problems of modern theory of law, examples of the influence of the Eastern intellectual heritage on the philosophical and legal thought of the West are pointed out. Separately, the application of the principle of multiculturalism is critically examined, with the help of examples, attention is drawn to the richness and relevance of the political and legal heritage of the East, factors that can hinder dialogue are analyzed, and ways to overcome them are proposed. As the boundaries of the dialogue, its goal is formulated, the need to avoid eclectic synthesis and uncritical borrowings and the application of the principle of conceptual Eurocentrism is noted. The author uses materials and developments obtained in the framework of jurisprudence, historical and philosophical research.
dialogue of cultures, eurocentrism, theory of law, methodological problems, orientalism, postmodernism in jurisprudence, legal thought
1. Burgete-Ayala M. R., Gerasimova I. A. Ponyatiynyy evropocentrizm: za i protiv // Filosofskie nauki. – 2019. – T. 62. – № 6. – S. 11–33.
2. Vayss B. Dzh. Duh musul'manskogo prava. – Moskva; Sankt-Peterburg: Dilya, 2008. – 310 s.
3. Gadamer G.-G. Aktual'nost' prekrasnogo. – Moskva: Iskusstvo, 1991. – 368 s.
4. Zhil'son E. Filosofiya v srednie veka: ot istokov patristiki do konca XIV veka. – Moskva: Kul'turnaya revolyuciya, Respublika, 2010. – 678 s.
5. Karelova L. B. K voprosu ob universal'nosti ponyatiynogo apparata sovremennoy zapadnoy filosofii: yaponskiy keys // Filosofskie nauki. – 2019. – T. 62. – № 6. – S. 100–113.
6. Krushinskiy A. A. Dao skvoz' prizmu logosa: ponyatiynyy evropocentrizm // Filosofskie nauki. – 2019. – T. 62. – № 6. – S. 33–53.
7. Lafitskiy V. I. Sravnitel'noe pravovedenie v obrazah prava. Tom pervyy. – Moskva: Statut, 2010. – 429 s.
8. Lomakina I. B. Politiko-pravovaya tradiciya Vostoka: problema ponimaniya // Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta MVD Rossii. – 2021. – № 1 (89). – S. 17–25.
9. Lukovskaya D. I., Lomakina I. B. Problema opredelennosti pravopoznaniya (v kontekste evolyucii yusnaturalizma) // Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta MVD Rossii. – 2020. – № 3 (87). – S. 26–32.
10. Mezhuev V. M. Rossiya v dialoge s Evropoy: genezis vzglyadov na stanovlenie rossiyskoy civilizacionnoy identichnosti // Sociologiya vlasti. – 2007. – № 1. – S. 5–34.
11. Nauka teorii i istorii gosudarstva i prava v poiske novyh metodologicheskih resheniy : monografiya / otv. red. A. A. Dorskaya. – Sankt-Peterburg: Asterion, 2012. – 483 s.
12. Nersesyanc V. S. Pravo i zakon: Iz istorii pravovyh ucheniy. – Moskva: Nauka, 1983. – 366 s.
13. Paribok A. V., Pshu R. V. Metodologicheskie i soderzhatel'nye argumenty protiv «ponyatiynogo evropocentrizma» // Filosofskie nauki. – 2019. – T. 62. – № 6. – S. 54–69.
14. Said E. V. Orientalizm. Zapadnye koncepcii Vostoka. – Sankt-Peterburg: Russkiy mir, 2006. – 636 s.
15. Stepanyanc M. T. Rasshiryaya gorizonty filosofii i nauki (vmesto predisloviya) / Filosofiya i nauka v kul'turah Vostoka i Zapada / otv. red. M. T. Stepanyanc. – Moskva: Nauka, Vostochnaya Literatura, 2013. – S. 7–27.
16. Stepin V. S. Nauchnoe ponimanie v sociokul'turnom izmerenii / Filosofiya i nauka v kul'turah Vostoka i Zapada / otv. red. M. T. Stepanyanc. – Moskva: Nauka, Vostochnaya Literatura, 2013. – S. 28–37.
17. Timoshina E. V. Klassika, postklassika... Neoklassika: k obosnovaniyu kontrpostmodernistskoy programmy v teorii prava // Izvestiya Vysshih uchebnyh zavedeniy. Pravovedenie. – 2014. – № 4 (315). – S. 6–29.
18. Timoshina E. V. Metodologiya sudebnogo tolkovaniya: kriticheskiy analiz realisticheskogo podhoda // Trudy Instituta gosudarstva i prava RAN. – 2018. – T. 13. – № 1. – S. 72–102.
19. Uott U. M. Vliyanie islama na srednevekovuyu Evropu. – Moskva: Nauka, 1976. – 128 s.
20. Chestnov I. L. Postklassicheskaya teoriya prava. – Sankt-Peterburg: ALEF-Press, 2012. – 649 s.
21. Ahmad A. A. Structural Interrelations of Theory And Practice in Islamic Law: A Study of Six Works of Medieval Islamic Jurisprudence. – Leiden; Boston: Brill, 2006. – 206 p.
22. Allinson R. A. Complementarity as a Model for East-West Integrative Philosophy // Journal of Chinese Philosophy. – 1998. – Vol. 25. – №. 4. – P. 505–517.
23. Bhojani A.-R. Moral rationalism and Sharī’a: independent rationality in modern Shī’a usul al-fiqh. – New York: Routledge, 2015. – 179 p.
24. Emon A. M. Islamic natural law theories. – Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010. – 222 p.
25. Hansen C. A. Daoist theory of Chinese thought: a philosophical interpretation. – Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press, 1992. – 448 p.
26. Reihman G. M. Categorically Denied: Kant’s Criticism of Chinese Philosophy // Journal of Chinese Philosophy. – 2006. – Vol. 33. – № 1. – P. 51–65.
27. Shabana A. Custom in Islamic Law and Legal Theory: The Development of ‘Urf and ‘Adah in the Islamic Legal Tradition. – New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2010. – 246 p.
