Russian Federation
The article analyzes the activities of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) and the efforts of China and Russia to promote the idea of forming Greater Eurasia as a non-Western international community in order to embody their geostrategic, foreign policy and economic interests. Based on the theory of institutional balance, the article reveals the significance of the SCO over the past 20 years, the expansion of membership and geographical coverage, as well as some of the problems that it faced in consolidating and realizing its potential. Although Beijing and Moscow have many common interests in the region, their priorities and approaches may not always coincide. The author argues that the most important transformation of the SCO as a regional organization lies in its usefulness in an exclusive institutional balancing strategy for the PRC and Russia to prevent widespread US influence in Central Asia, to build trust among member states, and to turn the SCO into a regional security community for protecting the interests of member countries.
regional security, institutional balancing, cooperation, international relations, SCO, Russia, China, USA
1. Hakimov B. M. ShOS i problemy evraziyskoy bezopasnosti // Mezhdunarodnaya zhizn'. – 2021. – № 2. – S. 144-145.
2. ShOS. Dushanbinskaya Deklaraciya dvadcatiletiya ShOS. Dushanbe, 17 sentyabrya 2021 goda.
3. Malyshev D. V. Shanhayskaya organizaciya sotrudnichestva i ee rol' v sisteme sovremennyh mezhdunarodnyh otnosheniy (k 20-letiyu sozdaniya ShOS) // Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 25: Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya i mirovaya politika. – 2021. – T. 13. – № 4. – S. 81-104.
4. Eftekhari F. Why Iran is so Keen on Joining the SCO? The Diplomat. September 7. 2021. [Elektronnyy resurs]. – Rezhim dostupa: https://thediplomat.com/2021/09/why-is-iran-so-keen-on-joining-the-sco/ (data obrascheniya 15.08.2022).
5. ASEAN and Regional Order: Revisiting Security Community in Southeast Asia. Routledge, 2021.
6. Alesina A., Rosenthal H. A Theory of Institutional Balancing // In Partisan Politics, Divided Government, and the Economy (Political) Economy of Institutions and Decisions. – Cambridge University Press, 1995. – pp. 43-82.
7. After hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy. Princeton University Press. 2005.
8. Brooks S. G., Wohlforth W. C. America Abroad: Why the sole superpower should not pull back from the world. Oxford University Press, 2016.
9. Caffarena A. Diversity Management in World Politics. Reformist China and the Future of the (liberal) order // The International Spectator. – 2017. – V. 52. – № 3. – pr. 1-17.
10. Breslin S. The Normative Basis of Global Governance // Fudan Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences. – 2020. – V. 13. – № 1. – pp. 1-5.
11. Müller H. The Nuclear Non-proliferation Teaty in Jeopardy? Internal Divisions and the Impact of World politics // The International Spectator. – 2017. –V. 52. – № 1. – pp. 12-27.
12. Kirton J., Wang A. X. China’s Complex Leadership in G20 and Global Governance: From Hangzhou 2016 to Kunming 2021 // Chinese Political Science Review. – 2022. – pp. 1-50.
13. Feng H., He K. China’s Institutional Challenges to the International Order // Strategic Studies Quarterly. – 2017. – V. 11. – № 4. – pp. 23-49.
14. ShOS. Deklaraciya glav gosudarstv-chlenov Shanhayskoy organizacii sotrudnichestva. g. Astana, 5 iyulya 2005 g.
15. Lo Bobo. A Wary Embrace: What the China-Russia Relationship Means for the World. A Lowy Institute Paper. – Sydney: Penguin Australia, 2017.
16. Lukin A.V. Rossiya i Kitay v Bol'shoy Evrazii // Polis. Politicheskie issledovaniya. – 2020. – № 5. – S. 46-59.
17. Kitay postroit specbazu dlya MVD Tadzhikistana na granice s Afganistanom // RIA Novosti, 28.10.2021. [Elektronnyy resurs]. – Rezhim dostupa: https://ria.ru/20211028/tadzhikistan-1756684202.html (data obrascheniya 10.08.2022).
18. Hlopov O.A. Problemy bezopasnosti i interesy Rossii i Kitaya v regione Persidskogo zaliva // Nacional'naya bezopasnost' i strategicheskoe planirovanie. – 2021. – № 3(35). – S. 25-32. – DOI 10.37468/2307-1400-2021-3-25-32. – EDN IEYYHV.
19. Seiwert E. The Shanghai Cooperation Organization Will Not Fill Any Vacuum in Afghanistan. Central Asian Papers. Philadelphia, PA: Foreign Policy Research Institute, September, 2021. [Elektronnyy resurs]. – Rezhim dostupa: https://www.fpri.org/article/2021/09/the-shanghai-cooperation-organization-will-not-fill-any-vacuum-in-afghanistan/ (data obrascheniya 11.08.2022).
20. Silk Road Briefing. Shanghai Cooperation Organization Not Recognizing Taliban Government But Will Have Dialogue. September 24. 2021. [Elektronnyy resurs]. – Rezhim dostupa: https://www.silkroadbriefing.com/news/2021/09/24/shanghai-cooperation-organization-not-recognizing-taliban-government-but-will-have-dialogue/. ( data obrascheniya 11.08.2022).
21. Singh S., Singh B. Re-imagining the SCO’s Geopolitical Expansion: Would It Be a Next SAARC? // International Studies. – 2021. – V. 58. – № 4. – pp. 491-512.
22. Manyin M.E. Pivot to the Pacific? The Obama Administration's" Rebalancing" Toward Asia. – Library of Congress Washington DC Congressional Research Service, 2012.
23. Alimov R.K. Shanhayskaya organizaciya sotrudnichestva: stanovlenie, razvitie, perspektivy. – M.: Ves' mir, 2017.
