, Russian Federation
, Russian Federation
UDK 343.3/.7 Bиды противоправных деяний. Особенная часть уголовного права.
In the presented article, the authors consider certain problems of qualifying the legalization (laundering) of money or other property acquired by criminal way, which are primarily due to the specifics of the subject of the criminal offense, as well as the difficulties of the criminal law assessment of complicity in the commission of crimes under Art. Art. 174 and 174.1 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation. Due to criminologists legalization (laundering) of money or other property acquired by criminal way (Articles 174, 174.1 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation) is one of the determinants of latency of predicted crimes because it makes more difficult to find, to solve and to investigate such crimes. The aim of the research is the criminal and legal appreciation of crimes under articles 174 and 174.1 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation. The methodological basis includes comparative and legal method, the method of formal logics and interpretation of the norms of the law. In order to eliminate the problems stated within the framework of this work, the authors substantiate and formulate proposals for improving the legislative structure of the compositions of the analyzed criminal law norms, aimed at their unification.
legalization (laundering) of money or other property acquired by criminal means; subject of a crime, complicity in a crime; a group of persons by prior agreement; organized group; qualification
1. Leonov A. I., Bedenko A. V., Volokitina Yu. O. Nekotorye problemy rassledovaniya prestupleniy, svyazannyh s legalizaciey denezhnyh sredstv, priobretennyh v rezul'tate nezakonnogo sbyta narkoticheskih sredstv // Vestnik Voronezhskogo instituta MVD Rossii. – 2020. – № 1. – S. 248–254.
2. Mynzhanov E. K. Ob osobennostyah protivodeystviya legalizacii prestupnyh dohodov // Vestnik Akademii Sledstvennogo komiteta Rossiyskoy Federacii. – 2022. – № 2 (32). – S. 182–188.
3. Gauhman L. D. Kvalifikaciya prestupleniy: zakon, teoriya, praktika. – Moskva: Centr YurInfoR, 2015. – 316 s.
4. Orymbaev R. Special'nyy sub'ekt prestupleniya. – Alma-Ata: Nauka, 1977. – 152 s.
5. Bavsun M. V., Lupyr' M. V. Problemnye voprosy kvalifikacii legalizacii (otmyvaniya) denezhnyh sredstv ili inogo imuschestva, priobretennyh licom v rezul'tate soversheniya im prestupleniya (st. 174.1 UK RF) / Aktual'nye problemy pravoprimenitel'noy deyatel'nosti organov vnutrennih del : sbornik nauchnyh trudov. – Omsk : Omskaya akademiya MVD Rossii, 2019. – S. 342–363.
6. Kiselev I. A. Gryaznye den'gi: ugolovnaya otvetstvennost' za otmyvanie prestupnyh dohodov i ee primenenie v bor'be s prestupnost'yu i korrupciey. – Moskva: ID «Yurisprudenciya», 2009. – 151 s.
7. Muksinova A. F. Nekotorye voprosy kvalifikacii legalizacii (otmyvaniya) denezhnyh sredstv ili inogo imuschestva, priobretennyh v rezul'tate nezakonnogo oborota narkotikov // Yurist'-Pravoved'. – 2018. – № 3 (86). – URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/nekotorye-voprosykvalifikatsii-legalizatsii-otmyvaniya-denezhnyh-sredstv-ili-inogo-imuschestva-priobretennyh-v-rezultatenezakonnogo (data obrascheniya: 23.08.2022).
8. Boyarskaya A. V. Problemy sudebnogo tolkovaniya priznakov legalizacii (otmyvaniya) denezhnyh sredstv ili inogo imuschestva, priobretennogo prestupnym putem // Pravoprimenenie. – 2019. Yurist'-Pravoved'. – № 2. – URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/problemy-sudebnogo-tolkovaniyapriznakov-legalizatsii-otmyvaniya-denezhnyh-sredstv-ili-inogo-imuschestva-priobretennogo-prestupnym (data obrascheniya: 23.08.2022).
9. Fominyh A. V. Legalizaciya (otmyvanie) denezhnyh sredstv i inogo imuschestva, priobretennogo prestupnym putem: problemy kvalifikacii // Molodoy uchenyy. – 2020. – № 17 (307). – S. 249–251.
10. Yapparov R. M., Yapparov R. R. Nekotorye problemy kvalifikacii deystviy po legalizacii (otmyvaniyu) denezhnyh sredstv i inogo imuschestva, priobretennyh prestupnym putem // Vestnik BIST (Bashkirskogo instituta social'nyh tehnologiy). – 2017. – № 2 (35). – S. 42–49.
