Russian Federation
employee
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
The current situation of «mass character» of higher education has led to the fact that a large number of graduates significantly exceeds market demands. And most often, the acquired competencies do not advise the requirements of the digital economy. Changes in the labor market affect education at all levels. The digitalization of all spheres of society does not bypass the education system. The requirements for skills and abilities are changing quite quickly, among which preference is given primarily to creative thinking, emotional intelligence, and programming. The emergence of new educational technologies has led to a rapid reduction in the time for mastering professional skills. Education is moving from an industrial model to a more flexible model based on building a career development trajectory. In accordance with this, the main trends in the education of the future are identified. Undoubtedly, the digitalization process determines the technologies used for learning — digital platforms, virtual reality technologies, digital organization of the educational process. Thanks to modern technologies, it has become possible for businesses to monitor the practical developments of not only students, but also schoolchildren in real time, preparing personnel for their needs. The development of individual career development trajectories requires an individual approach to the learning process based on adaptive programs, taking into account cognitive abilities, basic education and motivation. Great importance is given to the analysis of the labor market and the determination of the most demanded professions in the short term based on the use of the Gartner curve. All this requires restructuring the educational process in accordance with modern trends and possible changes in the labor market.
career path, educational trends and technologies, EDUHR
1. Akaev, A.A., Desyatko, D.N., Petryakov, A.A., Sarygulov, A.L. Regional development and education system in the context of digital transformation // Economics of the region, 2020, no. 4 (16), pp. 1031–1045.
2. Nosirov, S.Sh. The ratio of learning and potential opportunities for the formation of intellectual knowledge, skills and abilities in the learning process // Bulletin of the Pedagogical University, 2015, no. 4 (65), pp. 15–19.
3. Solosichenko, T. Z., Goncharova, N. A., Nesterova, Z. V. Practiceoriented approach in the training of university specialists as a means of developing the digital economy / ed. HELL. Nazarova // Proceedings of the 2nd International Scientific and Practical Conference «Modern trends in management and the digital economy: from regional development to global economic growth» (MTDE 2020), 2020, pp. 1088–1094.
4. Fatkullin, N.Yu., Shamshovich, V.F., VaindorfSysoeva, M.E. The relevance of student differentiation in the modern system of additional professional education // Bulletin of Tom. state university, 2020, no. 460, pp. 220–227.'
5. BoschSijtsema, P., ClaesonJonsson, C., Johansson, M., Roupe, M. The hype factor of digital technologies in AEC. Construction InnovationEngland, 2021, V. 21, i. 4, p. 899–916.
6. Gapsalamov, A.R., Merzon, E.E., Kuznetsov, M.S., Vasilev, V.L., Bochkareva, T.N. The Education System in the Context of Socioeconomic Transformations. Periodico Tche Qumica, 2020, V.17, i.34, p. 874–883.
7. Jansen, N., Hinz, O. Inferring Opinion Leadership from Digital Footprints. Journal of Business Research, 2021, V.129, p. 1123–1137.
8. Rauscher, W., Badenhorst, H. Thinking critically about critical thinking dispositions in technology education. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 2020, V.31, i.3, p. 465–488.
9. Tong, XP., Jacobs, R.L., Wang, YR. Managers' Perceptions of the Accountability of Corporate University Programs, Involvement in the Corporate University Programs and Commitment to the Organization. Journal of Workplace Learning, 2022, V. 34, i. 4, p. 309–326.
