Analyzing one of the key forms of financial and legal liability — monetary responsibilities, the author explores the relationship between such legal categories as responsibility and obligation. For these purposes, the author makes a comparative assessment of the essential characteristics of monetary responsibilities established by the financial and legal norms and monetary obligations. On closer inspection, it becomes obvious that, primarily, civil law duties, being the most doctrinally and legislatively developed legal institution, should become the object of comparison. The article reveals differences between monetary responsibilities and monetary obligations on the grounds of their origin, subject matter, the nature of arising relationship and the date of termination. Among the key features that distinguish monetary responsibilities from monetary obligations there are extra contractual nature of their occurrence, mandatory participation of a public legal institute (in behalf of whom the execution is exercised and who is vested with the power in relation to the party liable), the impossibility of replacing the members, the public purpose of occurrence, the imperative nature of the definition of the duty and the date of its termination as of the moment of proper execution of the will by the party liable aimed at the termination of the duty.
Duty (responsibility), obligation, monetary responsibility, monetary obligation, financial law, positive enforcement.
1. Agarkov M. M. Izbrannye trudy po grazhdanskomu pravu. T. 1. M., 2002.
2. Bakhrakh D. N. Administrativnoe pravo: uchebnik. M., 1996.
3. Belov V. A. Denezhnye obyazatel´stva. M., 2001.
4. Bogdanova E. E. Printsip real´nogo ispolneniya obyazatel´stva v dogovorakh kupli-prodazhi i postavki: problema realizatsii. Zakonodatel´stvo i ekonomika. 2005. № 3.
5. Bryzgalin A. V. Retsenziya na monografiyu I. I. Kucherova «Den´gi, denezhnye obyazannosti i denezhnye vzyskaniya». Nalogi i finansovoe pravo. 2013. № 10.
6. Vdovichen V. A. Pravovoe ponyatie publichnogo nalogovogo protsessa. Sovremennaya teoriya finansovogo prava: sb. mater. mezhdunar. nauch.-prakt. konf. / pod red. S. V. Zapol´skogo, I. A. Tsindeliani. M., 2011.
7. Volkova N. N. Sootnoshenie publichnogo i chastnogo prava v regulirovanii nalogovykh otnosheniy. Sootnoshenie publichnogo i chastnogo v pravovom regulirovanii finansovykh i smezhnykh ekonomicheskikh otnosheniy: mater. mezhdunar. nauch.-prakt. konf. M., 2012.
8. Voronov E. N. Aktual´nye problemy prinuditel´nogo ispolneniya nalogovoy obyazannosti v Rossiyskoy Federatsii. Pravo i ekonomika. 2012. № 7.
9. Demin A. V. Obshchie voprosy teorii administrativnogo dogovora. Krasnoyarsk, 1998.
10. Erakhtina O. S. Pravovye printsipy i normy o prinuditel´nom ispolnenii dogovornykh obyazatel´stv. Zakony Rossii: opyt, analiz, praktika. 2012. № 12.
11. Ivanova V. N. O vozmozhnosti ispol´zovaniya elementa pravovoy materii «yuridicheskaya konstruktsiya» dlya formirovaniya zakonodatel´noy definitsii «yuridicheskaya konstruktsiya naloga» s tsel´yu vyrazheniya yuridicheskoy sushchnosti naloga v Nalogovom kodekse Rossiyskoy Federatsii. Zakonodatel´naya definitsiya: logiko-gnoseologicheskie, politiko-yuridicheskie, moral´no-psikhologicheskie i prakticheskie problemy: mater. Mezhdunar. «kruglogo stola» (Chernovtsy, 21—23 sentyabrya 2006 g.) / pod red. V. M. Baranova, P. S. Patsurkivskogo, G. O. Matyushkina. N. Novgorod, 2007.
12. Krasyukov A. V. Nalogovoe obyazatel´stvo: ponyatie i priznaki. Rossiyskaya yustitsiya. 2012. № 8.
13. Kucherov I. I. Obyazannost´ po uplate nalogov (nalogovaya obyazannost´) v sostave denezhnykh obyazannostey. Ocherki nalogovo-pravovoy nauki sovremennosti: monografiya / pod obshch. red. E. Yu. Grachevoy, N. P. Kucheryavenko. M.; Khar´kov, 2013.
14. Kucherov I. I. Pravovye priznaki denezhnykh obyazannostey i ikh otlichie ot denezhnykh. Finansovoe pravo. 2012. № 3.
15. Kucherov I. I. Teoriya nalogov i sborov (pravovye aspekty). M., 2009.
16. Pokrovskiy I. A. Osnovnye problemy grazhdanskogo prava. 4-e izd. M., 2003.
17. Porokhov E. V. Teoriya nalogovykh obyazatel´stv. Almaty, 2001.
18. Rogacheva O. S., Koshevarova E. A. Administrativnyy dogovor kak osnovanie vozniknoveniya administrativno-dogovornogo obyazatel´stva. Administrativnoe pravo i protsess. 2012. № 12.
19. Samsin I. L. Sootnoshenie ponyatiy nalogovoy obyazannosti i nalogovogo obyazatel´stva. Finansovoe pravo. 2012. № 3.
20. Smorgunova M. E. Obyazatel´stvennoe pravo i obyazatel´stvo: problemy terminologii v grazhdanskom prave i zakonodatel´stve. Grazhdanskoe pravo. 2008. № 2.
21. Tarabaev P. S. O nepravomernykh deystviyakh i yuridicheskikh sobytiyakh kak osnovaniyakh dvizheniya nedenezhnykh obyazatel´stv. Yuridicheskiy mir. 2013. № 9.
22. Chibinev V. M. Problemy sootnosheniya ponyatiy «obyazannost´» i «obyazatel´stvo» v nalogovom prave. Nalogi. 2006. № 3.
23. Shcherbakova L. V. Vidy administrativno-dogovornykh obyazatel´stv: osnovnye kriterii klassifikatsii. Administrativnoe i munitsipal´noe pravo. 2013. № 3.
24. Yusupov V. A. Pravoprimenitel´naya deyatel´nost´ organov gosudarstvennogo upravleniya. M., 1973.
