The role of the in-house counsels in the commercial companies in the development of alternative dispute resolution practices is currently becoming widespread. The author studies the positive experience accumulated by foreign companies. Also, the article examines the trends where the role of in-house counsels is changing to become more than merely supportive, but to the status of a full fledged party in matters of company management through the system of conflict management which is built into the structure of the company’s business development. In view thereof, the author comes to the conclusion that it is desirable to acquaint the in-house counsels with negotiation technologies in dealing with commercial counterparts.
Alternative dispute resolution, mediation, conflict management, dispute management, early dispute resolution, in-house counsels, compliance.
1. Bryan K. Use Mediaton Training to be a Client Centered-Lawyer from the Experts (Corporate counsel 2014 fn. 35).
2. Fleerackers F. The Role of Law in Interaction: Mediation and Legal Thinking. European Mediation Training for Practitioners of Justice. A Guide to European Mediation. AIA. Maklu. Antwerpen Apeldoorn Portland.
3. Michael T. Colatrella Jr. Cutting the Cost of Conflict by Creating a “Dispute-Wise” Organization. URL: www.law.unlv.edu/pdf/.../Colatrella.ppt.
4. Naimark R., Vaugnon I., Appel M. Dispute-Wise Business Management‚ Best Corporate Practices in Conflict Management from France. 2013. FIDAL/AAA/ICDR, 3. URL: www.adr.org/aaa/ShowPDF?doc=ADRSTAGE2013413.
5. Najar J.-C., Mallet-Prevost C. Colt & Mosle LLP — Corporate Counsel in the Era of Dispute Management 2.0. Business Law International. Vol. 15. 2014. No. 3.
6. Peters D. Understanding Why Lawyers Resist Mediation. URL: http://imimediation.org/cache/downloads/2h8fcljodbggcok8osgc400gogcw84k/understanding-why-lawyers-acrossthe-world-resist-mediation.pdf.
7. Phillip M. Armstrong. Georgia-Pacific’s ADR Program: A Critical Review After 10 Years, 60 Disp. Resol. J. 19 (Jul 2005).
8. Rowe M., Simon M. A Discussion of the Effectiveness of Organizational Ombudsman. 2001. URL: http://web.mit.edu/ombud/publications/index.html.
9. Abramson G. I. Soprovozhdenie storon v protsedure mediatsii. Rukovodstvo dlya advokatov i konsul´tiruyushchikh yuristov. M., 2013.
10. Gaydaenko Sher N. I. Formirovanie al´ternativnykh mekhanizmov razresheniya sporov: beskonfliktnoe obshchestvo kak osnova protivodeystviya korruptsii: nauch.-prakt. posobie / otv. red. N. G. Semilyutina. M., 2015.
11. Kolodkina I. Sud´yam sekonomyat vremya. Plenum Verkhovnogo Suda RF odobril popravki v Arbitrazhnyy protsessual´nyy kodeks. URL: http://www.rg.ru/2014/10/28/popravki.html.
