employee
Tyumen, Russian Federation
The paper is devoted to the problem of higher education quality improving, and to the necessity of taking into account in this process the educational space subjects: students, teachers and employers. Theoretical and methodological approaches to quality assessment problem have been considered, and system-social approach has been selected, which allow include the satisfaction both of students and teachers with different aspects of high educational institution life into this assessment criteria. Based on such approach a methodology has been developed, and a sociological research on materials of Russian oil and gas high educational institutions, training professionals for the Russian economy’s most significant sector, has been carried out. As a result, the relationships of education quality and satisfaction both of students and educators with the educational process as a whole and its individual elements have been revealed. The assessment of high educational institutions’ graduates made by their employers, as well as recommendations on quality improving in some training directions, aimed at implementation of practiceoriented approach to training, have been presented. A comparison of the situation both in different high educational institutions and between students studying on technical and managerial specialties has been carried out. Particular attention has been paid to the development based on this research’s results of regional oil and gas higher educational institution model in the conditions of higher education modernization, taking into account the interaction of all stakeholders (real economy enterprises, government structures, civil society). Also an oil and gas higher educational institution development realization mechanism has been proposed, considering all the activities of the educational institution (the education, research and innovation, sociocultural ones) with a system approach, allowing it to become successful in the international market of educational services in the oil and gas industry
education quality, satisfaction with training, oil and gas higher educational institutions, competence of graduates.
Статья подготовлена при поддержке РГНФ (Грант № 15-03-00367а).
1. Bordovskiy G.A. Upravlenie kachestvom obrazovatel’nogo protsessa [Quality management of educational process]. St. Petersburg, RSPU. Herzen Publ., 2001. 34 р.
2. Vlasceanu L. Quality Assurance and Accreditation: A Glossary of Basic Terms and Defi nition. Bucharest, 2007. 152 p.
3. Westerheij den D.F. Pers, performance and power: quality assessment in the Netherfands. Peer review and performance indicatiors quality assessment in British and Dutsh higher education Westerheij den Utreoht: Lemma, pр. 183–207.
4. Zvonnikov V.I. Kontrol’ kachestva obucheniya pri attestatsii (kompetentnostnyy podkhod) [Quality control training for certifi cation (competence approach)]. Moscow, University Book Publ., 2009. 272 р.
5. Savin I. Upravlenie universitetom: sotsiologicheskoe izmerenie kachestva obrazovaniya [University management: sociological dimension of the quality of education]. Sotsial’no-ekonomicheskie problemy razvitiya Rossii i protsessy globalizatsii: potentsial vozmozhnogo [Socio-economic problems of Russia’s development and the processes of globalization: the potential of the possible]. St. Petersburg, 2007, pp. 249–253. (in Russian)
6. Silin A.N. Upravlenie kachestvom obrazovatel’noy deyatel’nosti: soderzhanie i innovatsionnye podkhody [Quality management of educational activities: content and innovative approaches]. Pedagogicheskiy vestnik Kazakhstana [Herald of Education of Kazakhstan]. 2005, I. 2, pp. 26–30. (in Russian)
7. Silin A.N. Kontseptsiya razvitiya professional’nogo obrazovaniya v Tyumenskom regione: otsenka traektoriy budushchego [The concept development of vocational education in Tyumen region: assessment of the future paths]. Vestnik Altayskoy akademii ekonomiki i prava [Bulletin of the Altai Academy of Economics and Law]. Barnaul. 2010, I. 18, pp. 193, 194. (in Russian)
8. Frazer M. Assuring Quality in Higher Education: A.Blueprint for Future. Higher Education Supplement Quality debate conference. 1993, p. 43.
9. Belonozhko M.L. Kachestvo podgotovki v Evraziyskikh universitetakh glazami studentov, prepodavateley i rabotodateley [The quality of training in the eyes of the Eurasian University students, faculty and employers]. Sovremennye problemy nauki i obrazovaniya [Modern problems of science and education]. 2014, I. 6. Available at: http: // www.science-education.ru1120-15833 (accessed 10 December 2014). (in Russian)
10. Belonozhko M.L. Kachestvo podgotovki vypusknikov universiteta dlya neftegazovogo kompleksa Rossii [The quality of training university graduates for oil and gas complex of Russia]. Sovremennye problemy nauki i obrazovaniya [Modern problems of science and education]. 2013, I. 6. Available at: http://www.science-education.ru/113-11186 (accessed 18 December 2013) (in Russian)
11. Frolov S.Y. Otsenka kachestva obrazovaniya glazami studentov [Assessment of the quality of education through the eyes of students]. Teoriya i praktika obshchestvennogo razvitiya [Theory and Practice of Community Development]. 2015, I. 4, pр. 31–33. (in Russian)
