employee
BISAC REL102000 Theology
The cognitive capabilities of the teleological paradigm of purpose are discussed. An inquiring mind everywhere sees that inanimate matter serves for living, and that, in turn, serves for a man. However, such a concept as “purpose” turned out from the contemporary science, although for a long time it went along the path of becoming the doctrine of purpose determination, or nomogenesis. The history of the substitution of the main paradigm of science from purpose to chance is traced. The overcoming of the catastrophic representations of Cuvier by the provisions of actualism and evolutionism is considered. From the middle of the 19th century, public opinion began to strengthen that every new scientific achievement casts doubt on religious beliefs. Criticism of biblical history began with the events of the Great Flood, as the key one in the Bible. The negative attitude to catastrophism in the Soviet scientific literature and the importance of ideology in the methodology of science are considered. The anthropic principle predetermines a radical restructuring of the general scientific methodology. It finally comes closer to religious knowledge. The anthropic principle is teleological and contains that goal (“eidos-entelechia”) in the structure of matter that impels it. In this light, the power of science is again seen not in confrontation with religion, but in harmonization with it.
teleology, evolutionism, actualism, catastrophism, ideology, anthropic principle, global geological catastrophes
1. Ritter K. General geography. - M: Edition of the book seller A.I. Glazunov, 1864. - 188 p.
2. Cuvier J. Discours sur les révolutions de la surface du globe et sur les changements qu'elles ont produits dans le règne animal. - Odessa, 1840. - 225 p.
3. Kuznetsov V.G. The value of the work of Charles Lyell in the formation of scientific ideology in geology // Lithology and Minerals, 2011, No. 2, - P. 209-222.
4. Shatsky N.S., Yanshin A.L. Portraits of geologists. - M.: Nauka, 1986.- 304 p.
5. Sysoev D. Evolutionism in the light of Orthodox teachings // Six Day Against Evolution. - M.: Pilgrim, 2000, p. 41-64.
6. Vernadsky V.I. Space and time in unalive and living nature // Philosophical thoughts of a naturalist. - M.: Nauka, 1988, p. 210-385.
7. Bufeev K. Orthodox doctrine of the Creation. Volume 3. Orthodox doctrine of Creation and modern theology. - M.: Russian Publishing House. center them. St. Basil the Great, 2019. - 656 p.
8. Gorkin A.P. On the relativism of economic geography (objective and subjective aspects) // Theory of socio-economic geography: current status and development prospects / Materials of the International Scientific Conference (Rostov-on-Don, May 4-8, 2010). - Rostov-on-Don, 2010, p.32-36.
9. Gillispie, C.C. Genesis and Geology. The Impact of Scientific Discoveries upon Religious Beliefs in the Decades before Darvin - New York, Haprer Torchibooks, 1959. - 306 p.
10. Jones R.H. For the Glory of God: The Role of Christianity in the Rise and Development of Modern Science. Vol II. The History of Christian Ideas and Control Beliefs in Science. - University press of America. 2012. - 272 p.
11. Catastrophe theory (catastrophism) // Great Soviet Encyclopedia. - M.: BSE, 1953, p. 365-366.
12. Grigoriev Al.A. The world of geography in the mirror of art. - SPb.: Asterion, 2019. - 238 p.
13. Bremer J, Khroutski K, Klimek R, Tadeusiewicz R., Challenging integralism, Aristotelian Entelecheia, Hyle and Morphe (Form), and Contemporary Concepts of Information, Touching upon the Aetiological Issues of Carcinogenesi // Biocosmology-Neo-Aristotelism Vol. 7, No. 1 (Winter 2017). - 111 p.
14. Berg L.S. Proceedings on the theory of evolution. - M.: Nauka, 1977. - 388 p.
15. Nevsky V.N. Geomorphology and postmodern // Scientific dialogue, 2015, No. 2 (38), p. 6-20.
16. Gogol N.V. Articles. / Selected Works. Vol. VI - M.: Fiction, 1986. - 544 p.
17. Vernadsky V.I. Problems of biogeochemistry // Transactions of the Biogeochemical laboratory. T. HVI. - M.: Nauka, 1980. - 320 p.
18. Lanza R., Berman B. Biocentrism. How life creates the universe. - St. Petersburg: Peter, 2015. - 224 p.
19. Lewis G.F. and Barnes L.A., A Fortunate Universe: Life in a Finely Tuned Cosmos. - Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016. - 373 p.
20. Armand A.D. Gaia experiment. The problem of the living earth. - M.: Sirin Sadhana, 2001. - 192 p.
21. Topchiev A.G., Yavorskaya V.V. Methodological issue sand transformation in contemporary socio-economic geography // Geographic digest, 2011, 1, p.11-16.
22. Barnes L.A., and Lewis G.F. The Cosmic Revolutionary Handbook: (Or: How to Beat the Big Bang). - Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2020. - 286 p.
23. Knyazeva E.N., Kurdyumov S.P. The bases of synergetics: synergetic worldview. - M.: Kom Book, 2005. - 240 p.
24. Subetto A.I. Pantacreator's ideas in modern science // Systemogenetics and the doctrine of cyclical development. Book 1. Tolyatti: MABiBD, 1994, p. 217-220.
25. Wallace A. R. The place of man in the Universe. - SPb., 1904. -292 p.
26. Tsiolkovsky K.E. The reason for space, Essays on the Universe. - Kaluga: Golden Alley, 2001. - 384 p.
27. Kaznacheev V.P. Questions of a new cosmogony: Digest of articles. - Novosibirsk: NGONB, 2013. - 208 p.
28. Mertsalov I.M. Fateful laws of the development of life and the attitude of scientists and " nonscientist " to them // System "Planets Earth". - M.: LENAND, 2020? p. 291-300.
29. Vernadsky V.I. Essays on geochemistry. - M.: Nauka, 1983. - 424 p.
30. Shaporenko S.I. The hydrosphere bilayer hypothesis: Justification and main results of the new concept // Geography Issues. Digest.133: Geographic and hydrological studies. - M.: Codex Publishing House, 2012, p. 117-139.
31. Herder I.G. Ideas for the philosophy of the history of mankind. - M.: Nauka, 1977. - 704 p.
