, Russian Federation
, Russian Federation
BISAC MAT041000 Numerical Analysis
This work is devoted to the application of a generalized computational experiment for a comparative assessment of numerical methods accuracy. The construction of a generalized computational experiment is based on the simultaneous solution using parallel computations in a multitasking mode of a basic problem with different input parameters, obtaining results in the form of multidimensional data volumes and their visual analysis. This approach can be effective in problems of verification of numerical methods. A comparative assessment of the accuracy for solvers of the open software package OpenFOAM is carried out. The classic inviscid problem of oblique shock wave is used as a basic task. Variations of the key parameters of the problem — the Mach number and angle of attack — are considered. An example of constructing error surfaces is given when the solvers of the OpenFOAM software package are compared. The concept of an error index is introduced as an integral characteristic of deviations from the exact solution for each solver in the class of problems under consideration. The surfaces of deviations from the exact solution in the L2 norm, constructed for each solver, together with the calculated error indices, make it possible to obtain a complete picture of the accuracy of the solvers under consideration for the class of problems defined by the ranges of variation of the Mach number and angle of attack.
generalized computational experiment, numerical methods, verification problems, error index
1. Federal standard R 57700.12–2018. Numerical simulation of supersonic flows for an inviscid gas. Software verification / National standard of the Russian Federation for numerical modeling of physical processes. 2018, 20 p.
2. Guide for the Verification and Validation of Computational Fluid Dynamics Simulations, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, AIAA-G-077-1998, Reston, VA, 1998.
3. Standard for Verification and Validation in Computational Fluid Dynamics and Heat Transfer, ASME V&V 20-2009, 2009.
4. Bondarev A.E. Analysis of Space-Time Flow Structures by Optimization and Visualization Methods // Transactions on Computational Science XIX, LNCS 7870, pp. 158-168. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)
5. Bondarev A.E, Galaktionov V.A. Parametric Optimizing Analysis of Unsteady Structures and Visualization of Multidimensional Data // International Journal of Modeling, Simulation and Scientific Computing, 2013, V.04, N supp01, 13 p., DOI 10.1142/S1793962313410043
6. Bondarev A.E. On the Construction of the Generalized Numerical Experiment in Fluid Dynamics // Mathematica Montisnigri, Vol. XLII, 2018, p. 52-64
7. A.E. Bondarev. On visualization problems in a generalized computational experiment (2019). Scientific Visualization 11.2: 156 - 162, DOI: 10.26583/sv.11.2.12
8. Alexander E. Bondarev and Artem E. Kuvshinnikov. Analysis of the Accuracy of OpenFOAM Solvers for the Problem of Supersonic Flow Around a Cone // Lecture Notes in Computer Science 10862, pp. 221–230, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93713-7_18
9. A.E. Bondarev. On the Estimation of the Accuracy of Numerical Solutions in CFD Problems // Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 11540, pp. 325–333, 2019. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-22750-0_26
10. A.E. Bondarev, V.A. Galaktionov. Construction of a generalized computational experiment and visual analysis of multidimensional data // CEUR Workshop Proceedings, V. 2485, 2019, p. 117-121. DOI: 10.30987/graphicon-2019-2-117-121
11. A.E. Bondarev, V.A. Galaktionov. Generalized Computational Experiment and Visual Analysis of Multidimensional Data (2019). Scientific Visualization 11.4: 102 - 114, DOI: 10.26583/sv.11.4.09
12. Bondarev A.E., Kuvshinnikov A.E. Comparative study of the accuracy for OpenFOAM solvers // Proceedings of Ivannikov ISPRAS Open Conference (ISPRAS), 2017, IEEE, IEEE Xplore, p.132-136 DOI: 10.1109/ISPRAS.2017.00028
13. Bondarev A.E., Kuvshinnikov A.E. Analysis of the accuracy of OpenFOAM solvers for the problem of supersonic flow around a cone // Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 10862, pp. 221–230, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93713-7_18.
14. Bondarev A., Kuvshinnikov A. Comparative Estimation of QGDFoam Solver Accuracy for Inviscid Flow Around a Cone // IEEE The Proceedings of the 2018 Ivannikov ISPRAS Open Conference (ISPRAS-2018). P. 82-87, https://doi.org/10.1109/ISPRAS.2018.00019
15. OpenFOAM Foundation. [Online]. Available: http://www.openfoam.org.
16. Alekseev A.K., Bondarev A.E. On exact solution enclosure on ensemble of numerical simulations // "Mathematica Montisnigri", Vol. XXXVIII, 2017, p. 63-77.
17. A.K. Alekseev, A.E. Bondarev, A.E. Kuvshinnikov. Verification on the Ensemble of Independent Numerical Solutions // Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 11540, pp. 315–324, 2019. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-22750-0_25
18. Alekseev A.K., Bondarev A.E. Estimation of the Distance between True and Numerical Solutions // Computational mathematics and mathematical physics, 2019, V. 59, № 6, s. 857-863 DOI: 10.1134/S0965542519060034
19. A.K. Alekseev, A.E. Bondarev, A.E. Kuvshinnikov. On uncertainty quantification via the ensemble of independent numerical solutions // Journal of Computational Science 42 (2020) 101114, DOI: 10.1016/j.jocs.2020.101114
20. Alekseev A.K., Bondarev A.E., Kuvshinnikov A.E. Comparative analysis of the accuracy of OpenFOAM solvers for the oblique shock wave problem // Matematica Montisnigri, 2019, vol. XLV, p. 95-105 DOI: 10.20948/mathmontis-2019-45-8
21. Bondarev A., Kuvshinnikov A. Parametric Study of the Accuracy of OpenFOAM Solvers for the Oblique Shock Wave Problem // IEEE The Proceedings of the 2019 Ivannikov ISPRAS Open Conference 2019. P. 108-112, DOI:10.1109/ISPRAS47671.2019.00023
22. S.V. Andreev, A.E. Bondarev, N.A. Bondareva. Stereo images of error surfaces in problems of numerical methods verification (2020). Scientific Visualization 12.2: 151 - 157, DOI: 10.26583/sv.12.2.12
