employee
Ekaterinburg, Russian Federation
employee
, Russian Federation
VAC 12.00.00 Юриспруденция
VAC 13.00.00 Педагогика
VAC 19.00.00 Психология
UDK 34 Право. Юридические науки
UDK 15 Психология
UDK 37 Образование. Воспитание. Обучение. Организация досуга
GRNTI 10.77 Уголовное право
The article is devoted to the problematic theoretical and practical issues of the content of the signs of the object of the crimes under Art. 166 of the Criminal Code. The authors determined the main direct object, revealed the essence of the right of ownership, use and disposal. Marked social relations that can act as an optional direct object. Particular attention is paid in the article to the subject of the crime. Attempts have been made to establish criteria that are crucial for the recognition of any vehicle as the subject of theft. The content of the terms “automobile” and “other vehicle” is disclosed. The analysis of the conformity of the literal interpretation of the criminal law to the interpretation of the law enforcer is carried out. It is summarized that the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation narrows the meaning of the term “other vehicle”, including in it only vehicles for the management of which, in accordance with the legislation of the Russian Federation, is granted a special right. The authors provide a list of such vehicles and formulate a conclusion on the advisability of specifying them as the subject of a crime. The narration of the article is accompanied by examples of decisions of courts of various instances in cases of crimes under Art. 166 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation
carjacking, object, car, other vehicle, subject
1. Ivanov N. G., Afanas'ev N. N. Otvetstvennost' za nepravomernoe zavladenie transportnym sredstvom // Rossiyskaya yusticiya. – 1995. – № 1. – S. 24–26.
2. Bezverhov A. G. O nekotoryh voprosah kvalifikacii nepravomernogo zavladeniya avtomobilem ili inym transportnym sredstvom bez celi hischeniya // Ugolovnoe pravo. – 2017. – № 5. – S. 20–30.
3. Voloshin P. V. Nekotorye voprosy opredeleniya ob'ektivnyh priznakov nepravomernogo zavladeniya avtomobilem ili inym transportnym sredstvom // Rossiyskiy sledovatel'. – 2010. – № 2. – S. 23–26.
4. Garbatovich D. Cel' ugona // Ugolovnoe pravo. – 2014. – № 3. – S. 30–33.
5. Kozun A. V. Ugon avtotransportnogo sredstva v sisteme norm ugolovnogo zakonodatel'stva // Zakony Rossii: opyt, analiz, praktika. – 2016. – № 6. – S. 32–36.
6. Chuchaev A. I., Pozharskiy A. Yu. Transportnye prestupleniya: ponyatie, vidy, harakteristika. – Moskva: Prospekt, 2018. – 242 s.
7. Semenov D. Yu. Otgranichenie nepravomernogo zavladeniya transportnym sredstvom bez celi hischeniya ot smezhnyh sostavov prestupleniy // Uspehi sovremennogo estestvoznaniya. – 2007. – № 9.
8. Yani P. S. Kvalifikaciya ugona // Zakonnost'. – 2017. – № 8. – S. 36–41.
9. Yani P. S. Kvalifikaciya ugona // Zakonnost'. – 2017. – № 9. – S. 34–38.
10. Yani P. S. Kvalifikaciya ugona // Zakonnost'. – 2017. – № 10. – S. 37–41.
11. Zgonnikov, P. P. Nekotorye podhody k voprosu soderzhaniya prava sobstvennosti // Rossiyskaya yusticiya. – 2017. – № 12. – S. 8–12.
