, Russian Federation
UDK 34 Право. Юридические науки
GRNTI 10.79 Уголовно-процессуальное право (уголовный процесс)
The relevance of the scientific article is not in doubt, due to the need to create a friendly justice in relation to the minor. The article deals with the problems associated with the need to distinguish the role and functions of a psychologist and a teacher as two completely independent procedural figures. Theoretical and practical justifications of participation of the psychologist and the teacher in criminal proceedings are analyzed. The difference between the above-mentioned procedural figures is emphasized. Attention is focused on the need to take into account the difference between psychological and pedagogical knowledge. The article uses the following research methods: General dialectical method of cognition, as well as General scientific and private scientific methods: formal logical methods (analysis, synthesis, concretization, analogy), methods of comparative research, formal legal. The article concludes about the invaluable role of a psychologist and a teacher, while the author distinguishes the above-mentioned procedural figures. In addition, the author substantiates the contradictions arising in theory and practice at the choice of a psychologist and a teacher in criminal proceedings. At the same time, the author emphasizes that the psychologist and the teacher perform various functions, both in the preliminary investigation and in the trial of a criminal case involving a minor.
criminal proceedings, psychologist, pedagogue, minors, justification, function
1. Vinickiy L. V., Surmeneva S. V. Uchastie psihologa v stadii predvaritel'nogo rassledovaniya: monografiya. – Moskva: Yurlitinform, 2015. – 272 s.
2. Bychkov A. N. Uchastie pedagoga v rossiyskom ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve : monografiya. – Moskva: Yurlitinform, 2011. – 176 s.
3. Cvetkova E. V. Ob uchastii pedagoga (psihologa) pri provedenii sledstvennyh deystviy // Yuridicheskiy vestnik Kubanskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. – 2012. – № 1 (10). – S. 20–23.
4. Hramcova V. V. Osobennosti pravovogo statusa pedagoga i psihologa kak uchastnikov ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva // Ekspert-kriminalist. – 2018. – № 1. – S. 32–34.
5. Kurmaeva N. A. Problemy uchastiya specialista-psihologa v doprose nesovershennoletnih podozrevaemyh i obvinyaemyh // Yuridicheskiy zhurnal. – 2009. – № 1. – S. 146–148.
6. Lyubichev S. G. Osobennosti rassledovaniya prestupleniy nesovershennoletnih na sovremennom etape // Problemy otpravleniya pravosudiya po ugolovnym delam v sovremennoy Rossii: teoriya i praktika : sbornik nauchnyh statey. – Ch. 1. – Kursk: Izd-vo Kursk. gos. tehn. un-ta, 2007. – S. 163–166.
7. Popov A. N. Proizvodstvo po delam o prestupleniyah nesovershennoletnih : monografiya / 2-e izd., ispr. i dop. – Kn. 1. – Krasnoyarsk: GOU VPO «Sib. gos. tehnol. un-t», 2004. – 156 s.
8. Mashinskaya N. V. Problemy obespecheniya effektivnogo uchastiya pedagoga i psihologa v dosudebnom proizvodstve po ugolovnym delam nesovershennoletnih // Vestnik Severnogo (Arkticheskogo) federal'nogo universiteta. – Seriya «Gumanitarnye i social'nye nauki». – 2015. – № 2. – S. 123–130.
9. Moiseev N. A., Pogonina E. A., Stolbina L. V. Psihologo-pravovye aspekty uchastiya pedagoga (psihologa) v doprose nesovershennoletnego podozrevaemogo (obvinyaemogo) // Nauka i obrazovanie: hozyaystvo i ekonomika; predprinimatel'stvo; pravo i upravlenie. – 2014. – № 12 (55). – S. 78–80.
10. Ozhegov S.I. Tolkovyy slovar' russkogo yazyka. – Moskva: AST, 2010. – 736 s.
