employee
Sankt-Peterburg, Russian Federation
UDK 34 Право. Юридические науки
GRNTI 10.07 Теория государства и права
OKSO 40.06.01 Юриспруденция
OKSO 40.03.01 Юриспруденция
OKSO 40.04.01 Юриспруденция
BBK 67 Право. Юридические науки
TBK 75 Право. Юридические науки
BISAC LAW000000 General
The article discusses non-legal terms from the field of morality that are present in the legislation of Russia. Among the non-legal terms considered are «good» and «evil», «morality» and «immorality», «truth» and «falsehood», as well as «hopelessness», «prudence», «impartiality», «loyalty», «Good name», «good faith», «voluntariness», «trust», «dignity», «reliability», «business reputation», «dignity », «evil», «malicious», «malicious», «abuse», «sincerity», «mercy», «truth», «ra-tionality», «conscience», «justice», «severity», «honor», etc. Most non-legal terms are contained in law nach federal authorities, including the codified acts; enshrined in regulatory legal acts that are sources of public law branches; have a direct or indirect relation to the principles of law; fixed in the names of articles or in the names of normative legal acts. Most often in the legislation there are such definitions as «reliability» and «voluntariness». Rarely found «good» and «evil» Most of the terms appeared in the 90s of the XX century. or in the early 2000s. In recent years, there has been a decline in interest in the use of non-legal terminology when it is used in the legislation of Russia.
non-legal terminology, legal language, language rules, legal techniques, legislation of Russia
1. Brazhnik S. D., Kasatkina N. N. Lingvisticheskie (yazykovye) pravila v zakonodatel'noy tehnike // Yuridicheskaya nauka. – 2014. – № 3. – S. 10–12.
2. Vlasenko N. A. Yazyk prava : monografiya. – Moskva: Norma: Infra-M, 2018. – 176 s.
3. Dobrikova E. Kompensaciya moral'nogo vreda: tendencii rossiyskoy sudebnoy praktiki // Oficial'nyy sayt informacionno-pravovogo portala «Garant» [Elektronnyy resurs] – 2016. – 24 avg. – URL.: https://www.garant.ru/article/864733 (data obrascheniya 25.04.2020).
4. Kashanina T. V. Sudebnoe reshenie i prigovor kak osnovnye akty pravosudiya: logicheskie i yazykovye pravila sostavleniya // Rossiyskoe pravosudie. – 2009. – № 5 (37). – S. 4–10.
5. Miroshnikov E. G. Yasnost' i tochnost' kak trebovaniya k yazyku prava // Problemy yuridicheskoy tehniki : sbornik statey / pod red. V. M. Baranova. – Nizhniy Novgorod, 2000. – S. 212–220.
6. Stockiy A. P. Yasnost' kak princip yazykovyh pravil yuridicheskoy tehniki v kontekste primeneniya neyuridicheskoy terminologii v normativnyh pravovyh aktah // Trudy Akademii MVD Respubliki Tadzhikistan. – 2018. – № 4 (40). – S. 90–94.
7. Pronina M. P. Yazykovye pravila formulirovaniya teksta ugolovnogo zakona // Yuridicheskaya nauka i praktika: Vestnik Nizhegorodskoy akademii MVD Rossii. – 2015. – № 3 (31). – S. 151–155.
8. Solov'ev O. G., Kasatkina N. N. Osobennosti primeneniya lingvisticheskih (yazykovyh) sredstv v zakonotvorcheskoy praktike // Aktual'nye problemy gumanitarnyh i estestvennyh nauk. – 2014. – №4–2. – S. 46–48.
9. Stockiy A. P. Kollizii, voznikayuschie v processe realizacii normativnyh pravovyh aktov federal'nyh organov ispolnitel'noy vlasti, ne zaregistrirovannyh Ministerstvom yusticii Rossiyskoy Federacii // Yuridicheskaya tehnika. – 2017. – № 11. – S. 566–568.
10. Yazyk zakona / pod red. A. S. Pigolkina. – Moskva: Yuridicheskaya literatura, 1990. – 189 s.
