employee from 01.01.2019 until now
Russian Federation
UDK 34 Право. Юридические науки
GRNTI 10.79 Уголовно-процессуальное право (уголовный процесс)
OKSO 40.05.01 Правовое обеспечение национальной безопасности
BBK 67 Право. Юридические науки
TBK 7582 Уголовно-процессуальное право
BISAC LAW027000 Criminal Procedure
In the article, the author turns to the study of the peculiarities of choosing such a preventive measure as house arrest for minors. Due to the fact that the Code of Criminal Procedure of the Russian Federation does not precisely define cases when a court must elect a house arrest in relation to minors, in practice there are often difficulties in which cases to choose such a preventive measure as detention, and in which house arrest. In the work, the author attempts to determine the essence of such a preventive measure as house arrest and the peculiarities of his election in relation to minors, and also considers the prohibitions and (or) restrictions to which minors cannot be subjected. The positions contained in the resolution of the Plenum of the Supreme Court “On the practice of the application by the courts of legislation on preventive measures in the form of detention, house arrest and bail” are analyzed. The author expresses the opinion that it is inadvisable to choose such a preventive measure as house arrest for minors. Based on the study, the author makes recommendations on the possibility, at the discretion of the court, to make adjustments to the prohibitions and (or) restrictions to which a minor suspect or accused will be subjected to whom such a preventive measure as house arrest is chosen.
measures of criminal procedural restraint, house arrest, minor suspect or accused, trustworthy persons, stage of preliminary investigation, prohibitions, restrictions, freedom of movement, full or partial isolation, penalties, etc
1. Kutuev E. K. Mery prinuzhdeniya v ugolovnom processe: teoreticheskie i organizacionno-pravovye problemy : monografiya – Moskva : Yuniti : Zakon i pravo, 2009. – 111 s.
2. Grushko I. T. Otdel'nye problemy izbraniya mery presecheniya v vide domashnego aresta // Mir nauki, kul'tury, obrazovaniya. – 2015. – № 3. – S. 234–236.
3. Ahminova Yu. Yu. Domashniy arest kak mera presecheniya na stadii predvaritel'nogo rassledovaniya. – Moskva : Yurlitinform, 2019. – 144 s.
4. Kolokolov N. A. Aktual'nye problemy ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva. Izbranie mery presecheniya sudom. – Moskva : Yuniti-Dana: Zakon i pravo, 2012. – 543 s.
5. Kolesnikov M. V. Problemy primeneniya mery presecheniya v vide domashnego aresta // Aktual'nye problemy ekonomiki i prava. – 2015. – № 2. – S. 240–247.
6. Maslova Z. G. Prismotr za nesovershennoletnim obvinyaemym (podozrevaemym) kak mera preecheniya po ugolovnym delam v otnoshenii nesovershennoletnih // Vestnik Orenburgskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. – 2013. – № 3. – S. 131–133.
7. Klimov V. V. Zakonnost' i obosnovannost' primeneniya domashnego aresta v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve Rossii : monografiya. – Moskva: Yurlitinform, 2013. – 153 s.
8. Andronik N. A. Mera presecheniya «domashniy arest» v ugolovnom processe // Pravoohranitel'nye organy: teoriya i praktika. – 2013. – № 2. – S. 30–32.
9. Aleksandrov A. Domashniy arest kak mera presecheniya v ugolovnom processe // Ugolovnoe pravo. – 2012. – № 2. – S. 82–89.
10. Chelpanova Yu. O. Problemy primeneniya domashnego aresta // Molodoy uchenyy. – 2018 – № 37 (223). – S. 296–298.
