94
Objective. The main objective of the study is to form the concept of building the interregional economic space. In order to achieve the objectives of this study we set and solved the following tasks: to reveal the process of building the interregional economic space, to show feasibility for implementation of the concept of building the interregional economic space. Methodology. The methodology of the research is based on fundamental regulations of regional and spatial economics, the applied aspects of theory and methodology of system analysis, scientific researches in the field of enhancing the innovative activity of territorial economy. Results. We discovered the process of initiation of the region into the interregional economic space through implementation of the level system. We held the land zoning of using the potential of interregional economic space by the Russian Federation subject. Scientific novelty. We identified the initiating onset of the process of building the interregional economic space. Practical relevance. Necessity for building the inter-regional economic space is caused by natural stage of economic development of federal subjects, and also by necessity to ensure the qualitative growth of material wealth production, reproduction of productive factors and to improve quality of life of population in the local region and in the whole country. Size and structure of interregional economic space depends on a positive action of the scale effect, which is to a considerable degree determined by innovative activity of regions.
interregional economic space, process, region, level system, economy
1. Heyne P. Ekonomicheskiy obraz myshleniya; per. s angl. pod obsch. red. Pinskera B. - 2-e izd., ster. - M.: Delo, 1993. - 702 s
2. Seriyx H. Boucher ou boulanger//Futuribles. - P., 2006. No 318. - P. 5-11
3. Perrow Ch. The Analysis of Goals in Complex Organizations//American Sociological Review, 1961. - P. 26, P. 688-699
4. Yuchtman E., Seashore S. A System Resource Approach to Organizational Effectiveness//American Sociological Review, 1967. - P. 32, P. 891-903
5. Seashore S., Yuchtman E. Factorial Analysis of Organizational Performance//Administrative Science Quarterly, 1967. - R. 12, R. 377-395
6. Holl R. X. Organizacii: struktury, processy, rezul'taty. - SPb: Piter, 2001. - 512 s
7. Chaplina A., Voycehovskaya I. Konkurentosposobnost' kak integral'nyy pokazatel' effektivnosti predpriyatiya//Problemy teorii i praktiki upravleniya, 2006. № 3. - S. 108-113
8. Timofeev R. A., Shlychkov V. V., Alafuzov I. G. Aktual'nye voprosy funkcionirovaniya regiona kak social'no-ekonomicheskoy sistemy//Aktual'nye problemy ekonomiki i prava. - 2015. - № 3. - S. 63-70
9. Shlychkov V. V. Ob otdel'nyh aspektah processa modernizacii rossiyskoy ekonomiki//Vestnik ekonomiki, prava i sociologii. - 2015. - № 1. - S. 78-82
10. Kachalov R. Upravlenie hozyaystvennym riskom - osnova ekonomicheskoy bezopasnosti regiona//Problemy teorii i praktiki upravleniya, 2006. № 4. - S. 45-52
11. Porter M. E. Konkurenciya: Perevod s angl., 2002. - 496 s
12. Derhy A. Fusions-acquisitions: la logique sectorielle//Rev. fr. de gestion. P., 1997. No 112. - P. 39-51
13. Chub B. A., Bandurin A. V. Sistema investicionnyh vzaimootnosheniy v regione na primere Respubliki Tatarstan. Izdanie vtoroe ispravlennoe i dopolnennoe. - M.: «TDDS - Stolica-8», 1999. - 272 s
14. Chub B. A. Upravlenie investicionnymi processami v regione. - M.: Izd-vo «BUKVICA», 1999. - 186 s
15. Shlychkov V. V. Teoriya i metodologiya upravleniya resursnym potencialom: diss. … dok-ra ekonom. nauk. - Yoshkar-Ola, 2007
16. Perroux F. Economic space: theory and applications//Quarterly Journal of Economics. - 1950. Vol. 64
17. Shlychkov V. V. Teoriya i metodologiya upravleniya resursnym potencialom: diss. … dok-ra ekonom. nauk. - Yoshkar-Ola, 2007
18. Shvecov A. Sootnoshenie centralizacii i decentralizacii v gosudarstvennoy regional'noy politike: o slozhivsheysya situacii, neobhodimosti i putyah ee izmeneniya//Rossiyskiy ekonomicheskiy zhurnal, 2006. № 5-6. - S. 14-35
19. Naisbitt J. Global paradox: The bigger the world economy, the more powerful its smallest players. - N. Y.: Morrow, 1994. - 304 p
20. Saralidze A. M. Metodika ocenki i prognozirovaniya pokazateley razvitiya mezhregional'nogo ekonomicheskogo prostranstva//Ekonomika, statistika i informatika. Vestnik UMO, 2014. № 1. - S. 162-166
21. Tamov A. A., Dobrovol'skiy A. G. Teoretiko-metodologicheskie aspekty issledovaniya mezhregional'noy social'no-ekonomicheskoy differenciacii v prostranstve makroregiona//Vestnik Adygeyskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya 5: ekonomika, 2013. № 1 (115). - S. 75-79
22. Gasparyan N. A. Mezhregional'naya integraciya kak uslovie dvizheniya ot obschego - k edinomu nacional'nomu ekonomicheskomu prostranstvu//Ekonomika ustoychivogo razvitiya, 2012. № 11. - S. 48-53
23. Dombrovskiy M. A. Strategicheskoe planirovanie mezhregional'nogo ekonomicheskogo prostranstva//European Social Science Journal, 2011. № 11 (14). - S. 410-418
24. Mirzoev R. S. Mezhregional'nye vzaimodeystviya v rossiyskom ekonomicheskom prostranstve//Vestnik Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya 3: Ekonomika. Ekologiya. 2011. Tom 1. № 1. - S. 96-101
25. Berezova Z. K. Sistemnye harakteristiki ekonomicheskogo prostranstva v ramkah mezhregional'noy integracii//Terra Economicus, 2011. Tom 9. № 3-3. - S. 147-150
26. Bozharenko D. Yu. Preodolenie mezhregional'noy differenciacii v novyh processah strukturizacii ekonomicheskogo prostranstva//Terra Economicus, 2011. Tom 9. № 4-2. - S. 164-167
27. Hodyrevskaya V. N., Krivoshlykov V. S. Formirovanie rynochnogo prostranstva regiona: mezhregional'naya torgovlya i novaya ekonomicheskaya geografiya//Sovremennye tendencii v ekonomike i upravlenii: novyy vzglyad. 2010. № 5-1. - S. 204-213
28. Karachurina L. B. Mezhregional'naya migraciya i social'no-ekonomicheskaya differenciaciya prostranstva sovremennoy Rossii//Problemy prognozirovaniya, 2006. № 3. - S. 96-115
29. Alafuzov I. G., Timofeev R. A. Klasterizaciya kak faktor povysheniya effektivnosti regional'noy ekonomicheskoy sistemy//Aktual'nye voprosy ekonomicheskih nauk. - 2010. - № 15-2. - S. 96-101
