employee
Sankt-Peterburg, St. Petersburg, Russian Federation
UDK 34 Право. Юридические науки
GRNTI 10.17 Административное право
TBK 7535 Административное право. Муниципальное право
The legal status of pets, as the object of legal relations between people, traditionally raises many debating questions. On the one hand, pets are objects of real law, on the other – they are animated creatures that can experience emotions and communicate with humans. Moreover, pets in case of their housing rules violations, often become a threat for the surrounding people’s safety. That is why the search for ways to modernize administrative and legal regulations in this area of public relations does not lose its relevance. The purpose of this article is to study the problems of administrative and legal regulation of pets’ keeping. Methodology: common methods of cognition were used - comparison, analysis, synthesis, abstraction, systemic, structural and functional approaches, etc. The results of the study made it possible for the author to formulate a number of proposals to improve the existing legislation on the pet housing regulation. The author argues the relevance of the pet registration introduction. In addition, the arguments are given for the necessity to establish at the level of federal legislation an administrative responsibility for assumption allowing a pet to attack a person.
pets, administrative-legal regulation, administrative responsibility, registration, assumption of attack
1. Vlasyuk I. V., Kudyanov E. G. Rany kozhnogo pokrova ot vozdeystviya klykov sobaki (mediko-kriminalisticheskie aspekty) // Zakonnost'. – 2018. – № 3. – S. 43–47.
2. Hor'kov V. N. Aktual'nye problemy administrativno-pravovogo regulirovaniya soderzhaniya domashnih zhivotnyh v Respublike Belarus' // Administrativnoe pravo i process. – 2020. – № 5. – S. 63–68.
3. Galuev A. R. Ustanovlenie administrativnoy otvetstvennosti za dopuschenie napadeniya zhivotnogo na cheloveka: analiz administrativno-deliktnogo zakonodatel'stva g. Moskvy i Respubliki Severnaya Osetiya – Alaniya // Aktual'nye problemy rossiyskogo prava. – 2016. – № 12. – S. 48–53.
4. Gubareva T. I., Trusov A. I. Administrativno-pravovoe regulirovanie priobreteniya i soderzhaniya domashnih zhivotnyh: postanovka problemy // Administrativnoe pravo i process. – 2019. – № 4. – S. 69–72.
5. Gorohov D. B. Problemy kachestva i effektivnosti primeneniya Zakona ob otvetstvennom obraschenii s zhivotnymi // Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava. – 2020. – № 4. – S. 153–157.
6. Mikryukov V. A. Blago i bremya obladaniya zhivotnymi na prave sobstvennosti // Zakonodatel'stvo i ekonomika. – 2014. – № 8. – S. 48–55.
7. Hor'kov V. N., Alles M. V. Spornye voprosy administrativno-pravovogo regulirovaniya soderzhaniya zhivotnyh v Federal'nom zakone «Ob otvetstvennom obraschenii s zhivotnymi i o vnesenii izmeneniy v otdel'nye zakonodatel'nye akty Rossiyskoy Federacii» // Administrativnoe pravo i process. – 2019. – № 10. – S. 75–81.
8. Bogolyubov S. A., Gorohov D. B., Kichigin N. V. i dr. Kommentariy k Federal'nomu zakonu ot 27 dekabrya 2018 g. № 498-FZ «Ob otvetstvennom obraschenii s zhivotnymi i o vnesenii izmeneniy v otdel'nye zakonodatel'nye akty Rossiyskoy Federacii» (postateynyy) / otv. red. D. B. Gorohov. – Moskva: IZiSP, Kontrakt, 2020. – 321 s.
9. Gorohov D. B., Gorohova Yu. V. Problemy pravovogo regulirovaniya otnosheniy po soderzhaniyu, ispol'zovaniyu i ohrane zhivotnyh, ne otnosyaschihsya k ob'ektam zhivotnogo mira // Zakonodatel'stvo i ekonomika. – 2015. – № 3. – S. 22–41.
10. Hor'kov V. N., Rubashkin V. V. Spornye voprosy ustanovleniya administrativnoy otvetstvennosti za narushenie pravil soderzhaniya domashnih zhivotnyh // Sovremennoe pravo. – 2017. – № 10. – S. 72–76.
11. Minina E. L. Problemy pravovogo regulirovaniya obrascheniya s zhivotnymi // Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava. – 2014. – № 12. – S. 80–88.
