employee from 01.01.1999 to 01.01.2022
Sankt-Peterburg, St. Petersburg, Russian Federation
Habarovsk, Khabarovsk, Russian Federation
UDK 34 Право. Юридические науки
The article discusses the specifics of legal techniques in the formulation of legal definition. A comparative analysis of approaches to understanding the definition procedure in jurisprudence, philosophy, logic, mathematics and philology is carried out. The relevance of the topic under study lies in the absence in modern legal tech-nology of generally accepted approaches to understanding the methodological speci-ficity of the implementation of the definition procedure. The purpose of this article is to determine the methodological foundations of differentiation of axiomatic and con-textual definitions, the implementation of the critical analysis of the classifications of types of definitions in the modern scientific literature. The basis of the concept of definition proposed by the authors is the analytical study of the logicallinguistic operation of determination on the example of the defi-nition of «corruption» from the Federal Law of December 25, 2008 No. 273-FZ. There is a lack of legal recognition of corruption as a bribe, and criticism of the narrow definition. Corruption is defined as a criminal act of a social and legal nature, which is constrained by the nature of official crimes in conflict with the interests of society and the State, the essence of which is an obvious mercenary motive in personal en-richment (material and non-material) through the use of his official position (authori-ty) for mercenary purposes. The study is based on the methodological tools of systemic, structural-functional and comparative cognition methods.
the legal definition, corruption, anti-corruption activities, bribe, official, denotation, connotation
1. Oleynikov V. S., Dzhegutanov B. K., Balahonskiy V. V. Filosofiya prava i pravosoznaniya : monografiya. – Sankt-Peterburg: Sankt-Peterburgskiy universitet MVD Rossii, 2009. – 231 s.
2. Balahonskiy V. V. Filosofskie problemy metodologii prava // Filosofiya prava. – 2011. – № 5 (48). – S. 5–19.
3. Frege G. Logika v matematike / Izbrannye raboty / sost. V. V. Anashvili i A. L. Nikiforova. – Moskva: Dom intellektual'noy knigi, 1997. – S. 95–154.
4. Kashanina T. V. Yuridicheskaya tehnika. – Moskva: Norma: Infra-M, 2011. – 496 s.
5. Nagornaya M. A. Tehnika opredeleniya zakonodatel'nyh terminov / Zakonodatel'naya tehnika sovremennoy Rossii: sbornik statey / pod red. V. M. Baranova. – N. Novgorod: Nizhegorodskaya akademiya MVD Rossii, 2001. – S. 220–233.
6. Turanin V. Yu. Principy zakonodatel'nyh definiciy / Sudebnaya reforma v Rossii: preemstvennost' i modernizaciya: sb. statey / gl. red. E. E. Tonkov. – Belgorod: NIU BelGU, 2014. – S. 430–434.
7. Aryamov A. A., Rueva E. O. Formulirovanie yuridicheskih definiciy (na primere antikorrupcionnogo zakonodatel'stva RF) // LexRussica. – 2017. – № 8 (129). – S. 90–100.
8. Markov S. M. Opredelenie ponyatiy. Topika opredeleniy yuridicheskih terminov. – Habarovsk: RIC HGAEP, 1998. – 24 s.
9. Balahonskiy V. V. Sootnoshenie ponyatiy «pravo» i «prestuplenie» v filosofsko-pravovom diskurse // Yurist'-Pravoved'. – 2011. – № 5 (48). – S. 5–7.
10. Sviridkina E. V. Spravedlivost' kak cennost' v kul'turno-civilizacionnom kode Rossii // Kul'turnoe nasledie Rossii. – 2018. – № 2. – S. 35–41.
