Nizhniy Novgorod, Nizhny Novgorod, Russian Federation
UDK 343.34 Преступления против общественного порядка и безопасности
GRNTI 10.77 Уголовное право
OKSO 40.03.01 Юриспруденция
BBK 6740 Отрасли права
TBK 80 Гуманитарные науки в целом
BISAC LAW026000 Criminal Law / General
Relevance: In our country, the activity for the return of overdue debts has a faulty reputation and is not sufficiently developed professionally. Violent debt collection crimes are increasingly discussed in the media. Only in 2016, Russia adopted a special law on the regulation of the so-called «collection» organizations. Despite the fact that there have been fewer high-profile crimes in the field of debt collection, these relations need further regulation. Problem: Due to the fact that the market of «collection» services in our country is quite young, the author sees the need for a comparative study on legislative regulation and combating crime in the area under study using the example of Russia and two leading European countries. Purpose: The study of methods of counteracting criminal acts in the field of debt recovery, used by representatives of the Romano-Germanic legal family, has not been previously conducted. In this regard, the author aims to analyze the legislation of the leading European countries - Germany and France in the aspect of combating illegal ways of collecting overdue debts. Methods: comparative legal, analysis, dialectics, analogy. Conclusions: 1. The author comes to the conclusion that in order to improve the professional activity of debt recovery in the Russian state, it is necessary to pay special attention to better training of personnel. 2. One of the author’s proposals is the idea of securing at the legislative level the obligatory entry of a “collection” organization into the professional community, represented by a special association. 3. A large number of illegal methods used by illegal debt collectors are associated with such a phenomenon as «stalking». In this regard, various approaches to the criminal legal counteraction to stalking in the criminal legislation of the considered countries can be useful in formulating proposals for improving domestic criminal legislation in the direction of stabilizing relations in the field of overdue debt recovery.
comparative legal analysis, Romano-Germanic legal family, debt collection, crime, stalking
1. Alekseeva D. G., Ivanov O. M., Pyhtin S. V. Problemy pravovogo regulirovaniya kollektorskoy deyatel'nosti // Prilozhenie k zhurnalu «Hozyaystvo i pravo». – 2015. – № 4. – S. 11–18.
2. Boycova Zh. A. K voprosu ob ugolovnoy otvetstvennosti za poddelku, izgotovlenie ili sbyt poddel'nyh dokumentov, gosudarstvennyh nagrad, shtampov, pechatey, blankov po zakonodatel'stvu ryada evropeyskih stran // Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta MVD Rossii. –2015. – № 5. – S. 65–66.
3. Galkina E. A. Pravovoe regulirovanie kollektorskoy deyatel'nosti v Velikobritanii // Vestnik Rossiyskogo universiteta kooperacii. – 2009. – № 1 (3). – S. 125–127.
4. Goryunov V. D. Rossiya v romano-germanskoy pravovoy sem'e // Vestnik Samarskogo yuridicheskogo instituta. – 2013. – № 3 (11). – S. 101–104.
5. Gusev D. N. Kollektorskie agentstva v Velikobritanii: istoriya i opyt regulirovaniya // Reglamentaciya bankovskih operaciy. Dokumenty i kommentarii. – 2007. – № 5. – S. 11–15.
6. Ekimov M. V. Kollektorskaya deyatel'nost' v Rossiyskoy Federacii i SShA: ponyatie i pravovoe regulirovanie // Pravo i sovremennye gosudarstva. – 2012. – № 5. – S. 34–39.
7. Zenichev N. A. Ispol'zovanie nezakonnyh taktik vzyskaniya denezhnyh sredstv kollektorskimi agentstvami i metody bor'by s nimi v stranah anglo-saksonskoy pravovoy sem'i // Baikal Research Journal. – 2016. – T. 7. – № 1. – S. 19–25.
8. Zenichev N. A. Problemy soblyudeniya zakonodatel'stva v sfere kollektorskoy deyatel'nosti na primere Soedinennyh Shtatov Ameriki // Zakony Rossii: opyt, analiz, praktika. – 2014. – № 8. – S. 44–47.
9. Myasnikova A. M., Cukanova E. G. Kriminalizaciya stalkinga // Viktimologiya. – 2016. – № 3 (9). – S. 53–56.
10. Osipova M. A. Pravovoe regulirovanie kollektorskoy deyatel'nosti: Rossiya i zarubezhnyy opyt // Izvestiya BGU. – 2016. – № 5. – S. 793–799.
11. Pyhtin S. V. Principy dobrosovestnoy praktiki deyatel'nosti kollektorskih agentstv v Velikobritanii // Mezhdunarodnoe publichnoe i chastnoe pravo. – 2015. – № 3. – S. 33–36.
12. Cepkova T. M., Filippov S. A. Nekotorye voprosy ispolnitel'nogo proizvodstva rossiyskogo i zarubezhnogo zakonodatel'stva // Vestnik Saratovskoy gosudarstvennoy yuridicheskoy akademii. – 2014. – № 2 (97). – S. 159–164.
13. Shvanderova A.R. Sravnitel'nyy metod v izuchenii istorii prava i gosudarstva v teoreticheskom nasledii M. M. Kovalevskogo, P. G. Vinogradova i F. V. Taranovskogo // Filosofiya prava. – 2017. – №1 (80). – S. 12–17.
