from 01.01.2020 until now
, Russian Federation
UDK 34.03 Действие права. Права и преимущества, создаваемые или сохраняемые правовыми актами. Последствия, взаимоотношения и обязательства, порождаемые правовыми актами, для сторон, третьих лиц и общества. Уклонение от права. Нарушение права. Ответственность. Возмещение ущерба
The legal regulation of social relations in the several past decades can be characterized by extreme instability. In many ways, this state of affairs is provoked by the acceleration of time and space, the increasingly intense concentration of events. The intensity, quantity, progression, content, goals, and many other parameters of these events often show quite consistent and deliberate nature, therefore they become instrumental in changing the existing reality in a strictly specified manner. What sparks interest is the fact that historically the process of deconstruction of the previously formed and successfully functioning fields of legal regulation is confirmed by numerous examples. In the past century, this phenomenon has received an appropriate explanation within the framework of philosophical knowledge. The idea of deconstruction as a reversal and reconstruction in the field of grammar and writing systems became popular at the outset of postmodernism and multiculturalism aimed at the transformation of modern reality through the rejection of former values. However, the fact of deconstruction, or rather, only its first stage - reversal - does not yet indicates the completion of the intended. The second stage - reconstruction - is equivalently important. The only question is to determine the moment of its beginning, the intensity of implementation, and the prospects for completion. An analysis of the events (including those of artificial origin) of the last few years from the standpoint of the beginning of deconstruction allows us to formulate some ideas regarding the future model of social organization.
deconstruction, legal regulation, event, reversal, reconstruction
1. Sanicheva E. V. Zh. Derrida: koncepciya dekonstrukcii i interdisciplinarnaya priroda poststrukturalistskoy mysli // Hudozhestvennaya kul'tura. – 2017. – № 1 [Elektronnyy resurs] // Sayt «Art & Culture Studies». – Rezhim dostupa: http://artculturestudies.sias.ru/2017-1-19/teoriyahudozhestvennoy-kultury/5211.html (data obrascheniya: 15.11.2021)
2. Shparaga O. O dare Zhaka Derrida [Elektronnyy resurs] // Sayt «Nashe mnenie». – 2004. – 6 okt. – URL: https://nmnby.eu/news/analytics/2117.html (data obrascheniya: 11.12.2021).
3. Bavsun M. V., Popov D. V. Metamodern v prave: oscillyaciya v tochke Kanetti. Stat'ya III. Ambivalentnost' prava v kontekste biopoliticheskoy strategii gosudarstva // Nauchnyy vestnik Omskoy akademii MVD Rossii. – 2021. – № 1. – S. 66–74.
4. Bavsun M. V., Vishnevetskii K. V., Ignatov A. N., Kashkarov A. A., Amarsanaa Vandan-Ish. Problems of qualification of crimes prescribed in articles 2071, 2072 of the criminal code of the Russian Federation // SHS WEB of Conferences IX Bal-tic Legal Forum “Law and Order in the Third Millennium”. – Kaliningrad, 2021. – P. 02002.
5. Popov D. V. Biopoliticheskiy povorot v prave: ot yuridiko-konstitucional'noy modeli k biopravu // Rossiyskiy deviantologicheskiy zhurnal. – 2021. – № 2. – S. 203–214.
6. Bauman Z. Globalizaciya: posledstviya dlya cheloveka i obschestva. – Moskva: Ves' mir, 2004. – 188 s.
7. Haksli O. Vozvraschenie v divnyy novyy mir. – Moskva: AST, 2021. – 192 s.
8. Shtegmayer V. Zhak Derrida: dekonstrukciya evropeyskogo myshleniya. Balans / Germenevtika i dekonstrukciya / per. T. B. Markova; pod red. V. Shtegmayera, H. Franka, B. V. Markova. – Sankt-Peterburg: Izdatel'stvo Sankt-Peterburgskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, 1999. – 256 s.
9. Sol Dzh. R. Ublyudki Vol'tera, ili Diktatura razuma na Zapade. – Moskva: AST; Astrel', 2006. – 895 s.
10. Syropyatova S. B., Allanina L. M. Pravovoe regulirovanie nacional'noy zhiznedeyatel'nosti i bezopasnosti v usloviyah pandemii // Vestnik Volzhskogo universiteta imeni V. N. Tatischeva. – 2020. – № 2. – S. 139–142.
