, Russian Federation
UDK 159.9 Психология
OKSO 37.00.00 Психологические науки
The article examines the concept of lying from the standpoint of researchers in various fields of science. This interest of scientists is due to the need for a comprehensive understanding of the essence of the phenomenon of lies for its effective diagnosis. Despite numerous approaches to the study of this phenomenon, in our opinion, its formulation, types, signs, internal and external evaluation criteria require special attention for a better diagnosis when conducting a special psychophysiological study using a polygraph as part of the selection of candidates for service in the internal affairs bodies of the Russian Federation. In this regard, there is a need to analyze this concept in the scientific literature to form and concretize the definition of a lie, which will undoubtedly lead to a more professional and effective approach to its recognition. In this work, a differential diagnosis of the definitions of lies is carried out, the author’s concept of the phenomenon under study is formulated, aspects of false interaction are identified that must be taken into account in the process of conducting a special psychophysiological study using a polygraph when selecting candidates for service in the internal affairs bodies of the Russian Federation.
lie, deception, delusion, untruth, the phenomenon of lies, types of lies, the nature of lies, special psychophysiological examination using a polygraph
1. Aref'eva O. V., Solov'eva N. A. Psihofiziologicheskoe issledovanie s ispol'zovaniem poligrafa kak sredstvo profilaktiki sledstvennyh oshibok // Vestnik Volgogradskoy akademii MVD Rossii. – 2018. – № 2 (45). – S. 70–78.
2. Vaynrih H. Lingvistika lzhi / Yazyk i modelirovanie social'nogo vzaimodeystviya : sbornik statey. – Moskva: Progress, 1987. – S. 44–87.
3. Vasil'ev V. V. Marginalii k rabote Kanta o mnimom prave na lozh' // Logos. – 2008. – № 5 (68). – S. 144–150.
4. Grachev G., Mel'nik I. Manipulirovanie lichnost'yu: organizaciya, sposoby i tehnologii informacionno-psihologicheskogo vozdeystviya. – Moskva: IFRAN, 1999. – 230 s.
5. Doklad, prochitannyy na zasedanii seminariya pri Laboratorii eksperimental'noy psihologii Moskovskoy Gubprokuratury i v Sekcii ugolovnogo prava Instituta sovetskogo prava. – Sm.: Luriya A. R. Eksperimental'naya psihologiya v sudebno-sledstvennom dele // Sovetskoe pravo. –1927. – № 2 (26). – S. 84–100.
6. Dyupra Zh. Lozh'. – Saratov: Nov'. P. S. Feokritova, 1905. – 114 s.
7. Dyupra Zh. Pochemu lyudi vrut? [Zvukozapis'] : psihosociologiya lzhi / Zh. Dyupra ; per. s fr. Dm. I. Solov'eva ; chitaet S. Fedosov. – Elektron. izd. i progr. – Moskva: Ardis, 2009. - 1 el. opt. disk (CD-DA) : zv., disk : (274 min.).
8. Znakov V. V. Klassifikaciya psihologicheskih priznakov istinnyh i neistinnyh soobscheniy v kommunikativnyh situaciyah // Psihologicheskiy zhurnal. – 1999. – № 2. – S. 54–55.
9. Znakov V. V. Nepravda, lozh' i obman kak problemy psihologii ponimaniya // Voprosy psihologii. – 1993. – № 2. – S. 9–16.
10. Il'in I. A. Aksiomy religioznogo opyta. – Moskva: Russkaya kniga, 2002. – 587 s.
11. Iovchuk M. T., Oyzerman T. I., Schipanov I. Ya. Kratkiy ocherk istorii filosofii. 4-e izd. – Moskva: Mysl', 1981. – 927 s.
12. Kant I. O mnimom prave lgat' iz chelovekolyubiya // Traktaty i pis'ma. – Moskva: Nauka, 1980. – S. 292–297.
13. Korovin V. V. Kak raspoznat' lzheca i lozh'. – Moskva: Pero, 2021. – 234 s.
14. Krogius N. V. Pravda o lzhi: problema refleksii // Izvestiya Saratovskogo universiteta. – 2009. – T. 9. – № 3. – C. 105–110.
15. Lipmann O., Adam L. Lozh' v prave. – Har'kov: Yuridicheskoe izdatel'stvo Ukrainy, 1929. – 47 s.
16. Melitan K. Psihologiya lzhi. – Moskva: A. Somov, 1903. – 30 s.
17. Povarnin S. Spor. O teorii i praktike spora. – Petrograd: O. Bogdanova, 1918. – 110 s.
18. Ratinov A. R., Efremova G. H. Yuridicheskaya psihologiya: sb. nauch. tr. – Moskva: NII probl. ukrepleniya zakonnosti i pravoporyadka, 1998. – 124 c.
19. Sluzhaeva V. Yu. Gendernaya motivaciya psihologii lzhi v podrostkovom i yunosheskom vozraste // Vestnik magistratury. – 2014. – № 3 (30). – T. 1. – S. 105–110.
20. Solov'ev V. Opravdanie dobra. – Moskva: Institut russkoy civilizacii, Algoritm, 2012. – 656 s. – S. 42–44.
21. Fray O. Detekciya lzhi i obmana. – Sankt-Peterburg: Praym Evroznak, 2005. – 106 s.
22. Fray O. Lozh'. Tri sposoba vyyavleniya. Kak chitat' mysli lzheca, kak obmanut' detektor lzhi. – Sankt–Peterburg: Praym-Evroznak, 2006. – 284 s.
23. Holodnyy Yu. I. Poligrafy («detektory lzhi») i bezopasnost': spravochnaya informaciya i rekomendacii. – Moskva: Izdatel'skiy dom «Mir bezopasnosti», 1998. – 95 s.
24. Shalyutin B. S. Chelovek lguschiy // Chelovek. – 1996. – № 5. – S. 151–159.
25. Shtern V. Psihologiya svidetel'skih pokazaniy. Eksperimental'nye issledovaniya vernosti vospominaniya // Vestnik prava. – 1902. – № 2. – S. 107–133; – № 3. – S. 120–149.
26. Ekman P. Psihologiya lzhi. Obmani menya, esli smozhesh'. – Sankt-Peterburg: Piter, 2010. – 196 s. – S. 12-22.
27. DePaulo B. M., Kashy D. A., Kirkendol S. E., Wyer M. M., & Epstein J. A. Lying in everyday life // Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. – 1996. – № 70. – R. 979–995.
