Novosibirsk, Russian Federation
The principles and methods of managerial decision-making in advocacy organizations are not legally fixed and are developed exclusively by representatives of the bar. Therefore, their timely assessment of the impact of various factors affects the ability of the advocacy to carry out strategic planning and make managerial decisions. The research objective was to describe the determinants that can cause significant socio-managerial transformations in advocacy organizations. The author conducted two types of sociological research among representatives of the advocacy community: questionnaire and expert survey. The research revealed three determinants of social and managerial transformations in advocacy organizations: the transformation of the labor market, the change in the list of required competencies, the spread of artificial intelligence and software. The article presents the grounds for considering these phenomena as determinants, their main features, and examples that illustrate the beginning of the transformation process. The article contains proposals for a structured and step-by-step change in the management of legal entities, as well as some recommendations for preparing for the impact of these determinants. The article also describes the idea of why some classical principles of management lose their significance in the bar in the process of transformations.
advocacy, social and managerial transformations, strategic planning, determinants, the fourth industrial revolution, labour market, competencies, artificial intelligence
1. Dissertation research on the problems of advocacy and lawers, comps. Ragulin A. V., Shaikhullin M. S., Petrov D. V. Moscow: Iurlitinform, 2012, 376. (In Russ.)
2. Voronov A. A. System approach to legal profession research and sciences about legal profession. Evrazijskaya advokatura, 2013, (1): 135–140. (In Russ.)
3. Kazun A. P., Yakovlev A. A. Russian lawyers: the establishment of professional community in imperfect institutional environment. Obshchestvennye nauki i sovremennost, 2014, (6): 39–56. (In Russ.)
4. Kazun A. P., Khodzhaeva E. A., Yakovlev A. A. Lawyers’ community in Russia. Economic and social development: Proc. XVI April Intern. Sci. Conf., Moscow, 7–10 Apr 2015. Moscow: NIU VShE, 2015, 121. (In Russ.)
5. Polanyi K. The great transformation: the political and economic origins of our time. St. Petersburg: Aleteiia, 2002, 320. (In Russ.)
6. Toffler A. The third wave: the classic study of tomorrow. Moscow: AST, 2004, 781. (In Russ.)
7. Sztompka P. The sociology of social change. Moscow: Aspekt Press, 1996, 416. (In Russ.)
8. Zaslavskaya T. I. Societal transformation of Russian society: activity and structural conception. 2nd ed. Moscow: Delo, 2003, 568. (In Russ.)
9. Social transformations in Russia: theories, practices, comparative analysis, ed. Yadov V. A. Moscow: Flinta, 2005, 583. (In Russ.)
10. Lapin N. I. The ways of Russia: sociocultural transformations. Moscow: RAS Institute of Philosophy, 2000, 194. (In Russ.)
11. Gulin K. A., Uskov V. S. Trends of the fourth industrial revolution (a review of the monograph: Schwab K. The fourth industrial revolution. Translated from English. Moscow: E, 2017. 208 p., ill. . Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast, 2017, 10(5): 216–221. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.15838/esc.2017.5.53.15
12. Schwab K. The fourth industrial revolution. Moscow: E, 2017, 208. (In Russ.)
13. Ivanova S. V., Ivanov O. B. Prospects of education development in the context of the fourth industrial revolution. ETAP: Ekonomicheskaya Teoriya, Analiz, Praktika, 2019, (6): 7–30. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24411/2071-6435-2019-10120
14. Balog M. M., Demidova S. E., Troyan V. V. The impact of digitalization of the economy on the labor market. ETAP: Ekonomicheskaya Teoriya, Analiz, Praktika, 2021, (5): 60–74. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24412/2071-6435-2021-5-60-74
15. Peshkova G. Yu., Samarina A. Yu. Digital economy and recruitment potential: strategical interconnection and prospects. Obrazovanie i nauka, 2018, 20(10): 50–75. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17853/1994-5639-2018-10-50-75
16. Frey C. B., Osborne M. A. The future of employment: how susceptible are jobs to computerization? Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2017, 114: 254–280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.08.019
17. Davydenko D. Iu. Overview of technological trends in industry 4.0 and their impact on human resources management. Innovatsionnaia nauka, 2021, (5): 95–97.
18. Pelyh V. Ya. Finance 4.0 as the idea of digital transformation of the financial sector. World of Economics and Management, 2020, 20(2): 134–148. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.25205/2542-0429-2020-20-2-134-148
19. Dorofeeva M. A. Educational technology of the Liberal Arts and Sciences model application in the training of lawyers. Theoretical and Applied Law, 2021, (2): 21–29. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22394/2686-7834-2021-2-21-29
20. Taylor F. W. The principles of scientific management. Moscow: Kontrolling, 1991, 104. (In Russ.)
21. Gagarin K. N., Kirichenko A. V. Socio-communicative competence of councel. Akmeologiia, 2015, (3): 53–54. (In Russ.)
22. Bayramukov R. M. Psychological features of the personal profile of a lawyer in executive activity: theoretical aspects. Problemy sovremennogo pedagogicheskogo obrazovaniia, 2020, (66-2): 301–304. (In Russ.)
23. Grits D., Gusev A., Kiselev E., Sabukevich Iu., Sorokina A., Ralko V. Skills of a modern lawyer: soft skills that increase efficiency and quality of life. Moscow: M-Logos, 2021, 459. (In Russ.)
24. Volini E., Schwartz J., Eaton K., Mallon D., Van Durme Y., Hauptmann M., Scott R., Poynton S. 2021 Deloitte Global Human Capital Trends. The social enterprise in a world disrupted: leading the shift from survive to thrive. Deloitte Development LLC, 2020, 64.
25. Busemeyer M. R., Trampusch C. The comparative political economy of collective skill formation. The political economy of collective skill formation, eds. Busemeyer M. R., Trampusch C. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012, 3–38. https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199599431.003.0001
26. McGinnis J. O., Pearce R. G. The great disruption: how machine intelligence will transform the role of lawyers in the delivery of legal services. Actual Problems of Economics and Law, 2019, 13(2): 1230–1250. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21202/1993-047X.13.2019.2.1230-1250
27. Busemeyer M. R., Trampusch C. The comparative political economy of collective skill formation. The political economy of collective skill formation, eds. Busemeyer M. R., Trampusch C. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012, 3–38. https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199599431.003.0001
28. Fayol H. Administration industrielle et générale. Moscow: Tsentr. in-t truda, 1923, 122. (In Russ.)
29. Kozyr N. S. System properties of the organization. Gumanitarnye nauchnye issledovaniia, 2015, (7-2). URL: https://human.snauka.ru/2015/07/12042 (accessed 3 Feb 2022). (In Russ.)
